homerjplatypus
HomerJPlatypus
homerjplatypus

ORLY?

He’s not a Neocon?

Nah, what would really be shocking is if she convinced Trump to be her VP, thus effectively cancelling the election.

She already was VP once, she ain’t do it again.

She’ll announce it as soon as Trump accepts the VP spot.

Donor lists are already public. The DNC also shares people’s info with all sorts of organizations that a donor never explicitly agrees to.

Unfortunately, Bill Clinton is not interested in the position of VP, so no the VP can’t be a dog.

Actually what it’s worth is the question.

So you’re telling me that these people were asked for the social security number by email, provided it by email and the DNC flunkies sent it along to the FBI?

Spoiler: financial information that is free is not worth anything.

Sorry, I call bullshit on that explanation.

Your argument assumes that Wikileaks hacked the DNC. They did not, as the only thing they do is provide secure platforms for whistle blowers to submit documents, and then publish those documents.

DNC donors are not public figures? Since when?

Er, meatloaf is not meat. You can’t go to the butcher and ask for a slice of meatloaf because it’s a prepared dish. Depending on what recipe you use, there is also no rule that says your meatloaf needs at least 50% meat.

There is nothing wrong with Wikileaks publishing this, or anything else that they publish.

If any identity theft results from this, it’s the DNC’s fault for denying that people’s financial info was compromised.

Instead of blaming Wikileaks for this, maybe the real question is why the DNC was collecting people’s social security numbers?

And yet we wonder why journalism is dying?

I dunno, if you really want to get ahead, you should start two or three days in advance.

I dismissed your reply because it consisted nothing but personally attacking me. You are not owed space to insult people.