Maybe for a lot of video games. But for this video game in particular, it was nearly a 1/3 of the desired funding.

So straight men and lesbian women (and bi anything) liking soft boobs isn’t enough to allow the creation something that they might enjoy?

Brian, is there some reason why my comments on this article are all still pending and not even viewable when I select “Show All”?

“All porn game companies, or developers I follow mostly keep to themselves.”

So a game cannot be built on real themes and still be a distraction? The two concepts are not, and never have been, mutually exclusive. Most humor operates entirely on this fact.

Those other things aren’t really bad for you tho. Death metal doesn’t make someone a Satanist. It doesn’t even cause violent behavior.

Woah, woah, woah... sexualized dolls cause women to be treated like inanimate objects?

So what... sexualized content should be illegal?

So everything must now be Citizen Kane or it deserves no place at all in society?

So it’s sexually repressive to appreciate an aspect of sexuality now? Even if it is campy, I don’t think your point of view holds a lot of weight.

Video games (and the industry surrounding it) do not (I would argue) share the same distinction of sub-categorization with the public and also has issues with the perception of the prevalence of salacious content.

Dude, you immediately lose all manner of an intelligent argument when you regress to extremes by comparing a sexualized yet not illegal or unethical thing to things that are EXTREMELY illegal and unethical.

Like so many other of his themes, that might be the point in it’s entirety. And in that point, if that is the point, I agree with him for putting it in there.

How does it feel being sex negative and puritanical? The world is dying to know.

Dude, time/labor is money. If it were so easy, people would just go ahead and do it themselves instead of looking to pay for it.

If it doesn’t violate TOS, then yes. I don’t agree with the content of the game. But that doesn’t mean that it cannot exist. It’s a fucking game.

If they planned the game as an attempt to trigger the reaction attained, then they succeeded. While I’m against the game from a moral standpoint, I agree with their overall commentary given the reaction.

I’ll let Mr. Ebert clear this up.

Equating a CO drunk in uniform to violating international law is asinine.

I think the very concept is flawed. What determines a gamer from a non-gamer? What separates a “casual” gamer and a “hardcore” gamer? And are these determining factors in any way rooted in our preconceptions of a what a gamer should look like?