Was going to say the same thing. This looks like something out of the Sunday Comic section.
Was going to say the same thing. This looks like something out of the Sunday Comic section.
It’s certainly not limited to feminism, but there are individuals part of just about every ideology who are willing to manipulate sides of a discussion in order to “win”.
Jesus dude... talk about misrepresenting her argument to the fullest extent of your power.
Any particular reason Allistair Pinsoff’s comment was removed?
Not really. As far as I can tell, she believes that gender is not wholly a social construct, which aligns fairly well with a lot of recent research literature, and that equality of access/opportunity should be the end goal.
Why would you want to create a rift between your so called contemporary feminism and it’s roots?
Take off the tin foil hat dude.
Your tin foil hat is showing.
Eh... there is still room for learning. Probably the most important thing I learned while playing a blow-out loss in LoL that has carried over to some real successes with HOTS was “don’t chase, don’t dive”.
This reasoning is ridiculous.
Review bombing is a problem. I think that a customer should have to have played at least some legitimate fraction, probably at least 1/3, of a game’s expected play time before being allowed to drop the proverbial hammer.
“in a MOBA, if your team is terrible, you’re looking at 20-60 minutes of your life wasted”
This is what happens when games become eSports and enter the boundaries of legitimate competition... people complain about that critical aspect of competitive play: losing.
My lil brother was playing Putt Putt Joins the Parade and Super Mario World at around age 4-5
For me, I’d say the tipping point is story. I didn’t care much for the plot or the characters of Far Cry 3, but DX:HR grabbed me immediately. I think its greatest strength is how it takes the core modern scientific, medical, economic, social, political, and environmental developments and fears and extrapolates them a…
No worries!
I think you misunderstood the point of my post. I was trying to argue that having a child transition to home-ed in this situation makes sense as an accommodation given the situation.
No. I’m referring to the staff at the Washington Post, who through their coverage essentially destroyed the RS story. According to their editor, they weren’t seeking to discredit anyone, but that the evidence was overwhelmingly contradictory to Erderly’s work.
I think you have to take into account that private schools do not necessarily have the same access to intervention services related to illness that public school systems have.
You act like it’s uncommon for these sorts of accommodations or alterations to be made for students that may lag behind due to illness. They actually are, particularly when it comes to some developmental delays/diseases.