hockeyd13
hockeyd13
hockeyd13

Lol... I like to think that you're just another troll... but even trolls aren't this committed to their delusions.

This is fucking lulzy to me given that Apple has done fuck all to fix its image regarding the veritable slave laborers in China that manufacture their products. But images of fictitious weaponry? Well we simply cannot fucking have that.

I'm done with this dude... his comments read like that of someone with paranoid personality disorder. Frightened of everything and overtly hostile for no reason.

So you give a list of threats, with no follow-thru. Point being exactly?

You're literally bending the actual construct of the theory in order to support her statement. latent impact on individuals within the group is often less than the estimation of those looking at the group through the light of their own bias. It essentially requires an overestimation of the effect on the media on

Threats come in well below that number, but we've already had action on a few of them.

Oh look, false equivalency. You going to ramble through every last fallacy in the book?

And the odds of one of these "assholes being unhinged" and murdering you is probably about as likely as you being eaten by a bear this very second.

Continue living you life as if hypotheticals are fact. You look like a fucking idiot.

Mark David Chapman is classified as a lone murderer and an assassin, not a terrorist. While not mutually exclusive, conflating the two here is ridiculous.

I find it incredibly hard to believe that she played any of these games if she is then capable of making a statement like this referring to her examples:

That's not how 3rd person theory works.

I should note that this kind of misogynistic behavior isn't always mandatory; often it's player-directed, but it is always implicitly encouraged.

Misrepresenting critical analysis of some of her nonsense as "hate" is probably one of the more ridiculous arguments I've ever seen.

The sun could explode tomorrow killing off all life in the solar system. A helicopter could fall from the sky killing the pope. I could wing the powerball. My apartment could be broken into and I could be robbed and murdered.

No, they wouldn't. Don't conflate unorganized harassment and threats with organized violence and terror a specific type of gain. They are not the same.

Given that the entirety of her works are being built into academic curriculum, any error of this magnitude (either ignorant or willful misrepresentation) is completely unacceptable.

"even if others may be influenced or manipulated."

Under the context of the theory, the first two statements are equal, while the second two are not. They are basically opposing statements.

In the case of the Hitman video, the part where she uses someone else's lets play to try and say that the game incentivizes killing the strippers, when in fact, the exact opposite is true. She either did not play the game and truly does not know, or is selectively omitting facts about the game's rules and mechanics in