Third person theory dictates that a person experiences media content and believes that said content affects others far more strongly than it actually does.

Her analysis is typically awful pseudo-scientific tripe. She can't even get the basic tenets of 3rd person theory right, and in fact applies it to a situation regarding the effect of content on a person in the exact opposite way of how the theory actually works. And one can obtain a fairly effective, though basic,…

It's time to stop calling this shit terrorism. It's horrible harassment and threats, but to pretend that it comes close to encompassing the modern day understanding of terrorism is ridiculous.

Really? You're going to bring the term "gamer" up as if it had anything to do with any of what went down in this? That's fucking asinine.

Relevant considering when you look at the harassment publicized as related to GG comes from trolls and doesn't even ever mention GG.

You continue to make an argument based on the assumption that the majority of GG is about harassment, when the majority of anecdotal and (non-research) statistical analyses show otherwise.

By your logic, feminism is then just as bad, if not worse, than GG simply because there is a subsection of feminism (TERFs) that actively try to harass and out transexuals as part of a structured campaign against them. So because they claim to be feminists, under your logic, all of feminism fails because of them.

Comparing SNL/SCTV sketch comedy legends to modern day SNL is like comparing delicious apple pie to maggot-infested orange drink.

That doesn't mean that a shitty reboot/remake doesn't have the power to damaging the series' legacy.

Eh, there are definitely a couple Polygon writers who have embrace crazy/fun violent games in the past and more recently decried the same for relatively moralistic concerns.

Yeah, I think they had the same icon in the shield indicator.

Love the honest logic.

This.

Here's a quick summary of one study, but there is actually a growing body of literature linking vegetarianism with poorer health outcomes.

I have to agree here. I have zero interest in the game and despite that fact, I was inundated with information that he was gay across many websites.

Censorship is the act of subverting any form of information, particularly when done for "moral" concerns. So rather than get into the "only the government can censor" bullshit counterargument, why not address my point?

Why would you want to censor this? Is it not better to show the CEO for who he is and allow consumers to make informed decisions regarding going to his establishments?

"Play a few minutes per session"

Lol... presuming to tell people how they should spend their holidays makes you sound like a total cunt.

"Can't take criticism"