Would totally be down for this, particularly if I can make my own playlists or use my own DJ mixes and whatnot.

Personally, I liked him far better as a normal person in Dark Forces than anything he became in the Jedi Knight series.

It's worth it, but be warned... it's also brutally difficult and borderline unfair. Still a fun game though.

Every quote above basically confirmed that it was a success and easily did what it was meant to do.

That's just so soft. It's there, it was used, and it meets the needs of the people that need it.

This seems like a pretentious amount of bitching. They provide a free booth that basically meets your basic criteria as a diversity service and you complain that they aren't doing enough?

Exactly. I thought that was really badass. Especially if you decide to go the pirate route, being able to set traps like that would be really cool.

CoD is "arcade-like". Accuracy is excessive and recoil is extremely unrealistic, especially while moving. It's possible to run and gun with a sniper rifle because there is basically no realistic delay when pushing an input that makes you sight down a sight or barrel. There are perks in place that are outright…

Strong this. As much as I really dislike the playstyle of Cod (which I oddly really enjoy in Titanfall), at least Activision didn't rush a project and end up putting out a real turn that still have major gameplay issues, 6 months after relase.

It is possible to get by without to be directly associated with any of the telecommunication providers if you wanted to live that way.

Lol, that's an utterly ridiculous oversimplification.

That's an extremely exaggerated expectation. WiiFit essentially existed in a vacuum. You've got far cheaper and diversified applications in the mobile market alone that are more effective and more appealing in the casual fitness community.

You've yet to provide any sort of reasonable proof that exclusivity actually harms the consumer in any legitimate legal or ethical way.

In my opinion, when the average gamer is unable to enjoy most of the available products (games) because of the rigid pay walls (platforms variety), that should be considered harming the consumer (gamer).

Well, the practice of exclusivity doesn't actually cause consumers harm. So start there. Secondly, why should companies like Nintendo be forced to give up exclusivity for IPs when it would likely destroy their hardware commitments?

Only ad hominem then? No legitimate response to my points? Noted.

I don't feel like paying twice to access content of a game (the purchase and the access), especially when the free online model had been stable for so long prior to LIVE. Personally, I give zero fucks for anything else LIVE has to offer outside of online play, so I'm not going to buy into it.

People like me, as in an individual who refused to, and still hasn't, ever paid for a single day of LIVE because I believe that gaming online shouldn't come at an additional cost, because it amounts to monetizing portions of a game.

The upgrade chip is fairly legit for titan AI. I've gotten a fair number of auto-titan kills on CTF while I'm off doing flag stuff and having it guard or follow.