Which you can then extrapolate to mean certainly?

Wait… isn't he about to be onscreen portraying J.D. Salinger?

I read the article as well, but the article buries the part about how the study is biased by lack of proper data points.

Was it a liquored-up kicker?

At this point, unless the brains were preserved in some way, I don't believe there would be an effective comparison.

That's actually not what the study says, William.

If I pull my head out of my ass, will yours come with it? :-)

The fact that you don't think these things exists either means you're blind, dead, and dumb, or you're one of them and you believe it's fine to demand speech be censored.

1000 times yes. The answer to every Regressive Leftist anti-free speech thought police asshole should always be, "Either it's all okay, or none of it is."

Not liberal. What these people are is not in any way shape or form liberal. Liberals will support free speech, even if it is speech with which they disagree.

Not liberals. Liberals would never be what the modern left has become. It's regressive. They are the Regressive Left.

That's pretty much Sean O'Neal's entire diatribe. He's cool when South Park takes on "conservative idiots," not so cool when South Park takes on the left, because the left is obviously smarter and the left cares and stuff and whatnot, so that should shelter them from criticism. Because they care. And stuff.

Ditto. You're a fucking imbecile!

The only people who think the Alt-Right have any political sway are their opposites, the Regressive Left.

Here's some light reading on the subject.

No… when they begin to restrict what you say because they find you offensive, that is where the line is crossed.

Everyone knows how it feels to be offended by something.

I don' kNOw. ThAT IS compLETELY new NEWS to Me.

EXACTLY.

Awesome. I rewatched The Battle of the Bastards last night and didn't get to sleep to after midnight. So as you can imagine, quite tired today. Enjoy your day!