He’s beefed with her before, what are you 12? He’s been doing this 20 years now.

What’s mediocre about someone with a syndicated show broadcast on three continents, exactly?

Why do black folks think attacking whites and torturing whites is ok? Also why weren’t those teens charged with terrorism?

Why is it good that he is charged with terrorism but black people aren’t?

As sick as black people?

Black people think they are taking back what was stolen when they kill white folks. And the teens who tortured a mentally disabled white kid BECAUSE he was white were not charged with terrorism.

Lol did the kids who tortured the white teen in Chicago get charged with terrorism? No, even though they specifically targeted a white person.

The data doesn’t play that out:

Heaven forbid that a privileged demographic (the girls) does not get the resources the under privileged demographic (the boys) gets.

HOW? THE GIRLS OF COLOR ARE DOING BETTER THAN THE BOYS! You are complaining about a problem that DOES NOT EXIST IN THE DATA. If the girls of color were being treated so badly and had such bad outcomes WHY ARE THE OUTCOMES BETTER THAN THE BOYS?!

That was a Canadian study ran IN THE 1970s! Are you really saying there will be no difference and no other work put forward because a study of a program 50 fucking years ago in a different country did not work out?

WHAT PRIVILEGE? THEY AREN’T AHEAD OF YOU!

Except the girls are ALREADY OUTPERFORMING THE BOYS. You are complaining that a system designed to catch a demographic up to your level is discriminatory. How privileged do you have to be to not see that?

Maybe because there are far, FAR more men in prison then women? Also women universally get lighter sentences and fewer years than men for the same crimes.

I love how this one incident is the same as years of terror attacks against the US.

THIS. Who the hell are these people? You do your chores or mom and dad bust your ass (for me it depended on the chores: outdoor chores were when dad got mad, indoor stuff was mom, cooking was both).

And yet, for all her persuasive power, Blake still has the most wins of anyone.

More viewpoints just sounds like “more pointless meetings where people jockey for position” though.

I get what you are saying, but both arguments still seem shallow to me. The idea of more women in leadership roles is that it will increase the respect and power of women and that is beneficial to the world. If women are going to be just as shitty, then whats the point?

Think about it: you are spending millions if not billions of dollars on something unknown. Rarely do people start new businesses with new concepts in existing industries, that sort of goes against what “new concept” is right? So most of the time these startups are new ideas that likely won’t pan out.