but on the other it’s the buggiest game I’ve ever played.

Hypercharged:Unboxed is actually a good game ( FPS and tower defence with a GI Joe style action figure) but is a pretty bad name. The studios previous ‘ New Retro Neon Arcade. ‘ is also a wordsalad , but a fantastic 80s VR arcade that you can add mame roms to and have actual playable cabinets in it.

At this point, if you’re gonna boycott games over pretty much anything the publisher has done wrong, you’re not going to be able to buy any game from anyone any more. For the most part, think about the developers instead, not that that gives you that much more choice.

That wallrunning gif makes me want a new Titanfall something fierce. Someday. Someday...

There are a few reasons, but disclaimer: I was a programmer, not a modeller, so I might be misremembering.

I noticed my head shadow is always bald while playing as Feminine V. I’m like.. ugh... where’s her glorious rockergirl hair.

I feel really #blessed because I’ve got thirty hours in on a base Xbone and it’s only crashed out twice. It isn’t pretty, but it’s been completely functional- certainly better than I remember Skyrim or even FO4 (which both crashed constantly) being early on. 

It’s still around, just freelance: https://www.youtube.com/c/HighlightReel/

First that creates a lot of work for them. Second, it’s a public relations nightmare. This is the path of least resistance.

hahaha wow. yes, i understand this i swear, i just... didn’t put two and two together quite right. glad i got my dumb moment for the day out of the way early... i hope.

But if you’re streaming the game then you aren’t testing your hardware. You’re testing the servers and your internet service.

It would do them no good to get involved in the current firestorm on CDPR’s behalf. It works in their interest to simply refund people and made CDPR pay out at some point. That said -both- Sony and Microsoft have done refunds on much smaller scales console wise for a good number of years now. It’s extremely rare…

I don’t own a Switch. And, like countless others whose lives have been disrupted by Covid-19, am not in a position to throw $60 at a game I won’t even be able to play until question mark. And that’s just what I can actually walk into a store and purchase. In the case of Fire Emblem - which is, at present, my favorite…

I don’t think it’s the “stupid” part that isn’t anti-consumer. I believe it’s the act of artificially creating scarcity for a product that won’t be around after March 2021. From a business POV that’s a business tactic. But from a consumer POV it severely limits the ability to purchase the product after the window of…

And yet, I can still buy a digital copy of orange box on xbox 360 from the xbox marketplace, on a console that was retired 7 years ago!

1. That is part of the reason people are mad - they know it cost Nintendo virtually nothing to make this, but they still charged the full $60 for it and gave it a limited release to artificially drive up sales. It comes off as being greedy, especially since (as you said) we all know they’ll do it again.

If it’s so insignificant, why are you going so far out of your way to defend and mitigate what Nintendo’s doing?

Capitalism is a two way street - if Nintendo makes lots of money from this, but it damages their reputation, they may or may not consider doing this in the future - taking customer satisfaction for granted is how a lot of companies end up rolling down a hill.

> Some things are limited time in life.

Nintendo is hilariously backwards when it comes to everything but making 1st party games.