Which is an asinine explanation that simply doesn’t hold water, given that there were supposedly multiple ‘alternate’ theatrical versions. 🤷‍♂️

I understand the preservation aspect of it, and it’s an important title.

My mind is blown. That was probably fifteen hundred words about how stereotypes and attitudes about fat people are being promoted by...a character that isn’t fat.

She’s not fat tho? Like I can't find any depiction of her as anything other than very fit and muscular. Not as muscular as zarya but still strong looking. You don't have to be fat to like food/want to eat a lot

I used to really like the articles on this site, and still have the habit of checking in every once in a while. Articles like this are so ridiculous and it amazes me someone took the time to write so much on such a nonsense topic. It’s no wonder the site has to constantly auto-refresh when idle just to push some of…

Everything that has ever existed can be viewed as problematic under the right lens. I feel like we are just desperately seeking reasons to complain at this point. I guess moving forward, just to be safe, all characters should be the generic placeholder body used in most game engines.

She’s a soldier for crying out loud, Of course she’s hungry they burn a ton of calories. If she hated eating you would likely be complaining that Blizzard was trying to make larger people feel guilty about their weight.

Man Brigite ain’t even fat, she works the fuck out, she is allowed to eat and sleep as MUCH as she fucking wants in her days off, fuck outta here with this shit.

What a waste of words this was.

Some people have made it their entire identity to attack people who are planning to play this game as bigots or bigot enabling and I just can’t with these people. I’ve donated a not-insignificant amount of my time and money to progressive candidates but im going to enjoy creative mediums and I separate art from…

Another famous Kotaku review of other people’s reviews. Pretty hilarious that G/O’s own movies and TV site reviewed the game before Kotaku did, and you’re reporting on your own non-gaming-focused sister site’s review. They somehow got to the game before you guys did? What is this site anymore?

I can genuinely say Kotaku’s writers over the past decade have been singularly the most amazing games journalists

Hack “journalist” puts spoilers in the screenshot for the article. Puts spoilers in the subtitle blurb, and then writes a secondary fluff piece for GTAO warning specifically not to get spoiled for that mission.

Can y’all maybe not shit on 76 every chance you get? It’s a good game now and the constant negativity from the gaming press has made getting my friends into it extremely difficult.

Yes, person reading this, it was deservedly panned at launch, but they’ve put in the work and made it worth your time now. Toxic players…

It’s why I’ll be getting an Xbox at some point. 

No one is ‘so mad’, it’s just like 20 people on Twitter. I’ve seen just as many people be happy to be represented and feel seen by the campaign.

What does that headline title even mean? “Had Reported Executive for abuse?” I know you guys need clickbait headlines to generate clicks, but at least make the headlines make some semblance of sense.... What a joke this site is.

Typical Kotaku, always trying to find problems and controversy when there is none all in the name of creating better click bait articles

Kotaku, you just keep saying things I do not understand. I truly am disappointed in how this team acts now a days.

I mean...he’s right tho?