It is the voice. Dear lord the voice. But also the cheekbones. Full on he can be meh to "wow he looks weird", but in profile?! Come on!

And people have been talking for years. It was a joke ln 30 Rock, for God's sake.

Yeah, sure, all the time. Doesn't everybody's?

people pick the weirdest hills to die on

"[Women] had equality," Delouis says about the 1950s, before Supreme Court cases legalized contraception and abortion. "But they had to be obedient to their husbands. That's where equality comes: where the mother stayed home and raised the children in God's light, and the husband worked, and everything was great.…

If this pisses you off, and you wish you could do something about it, YOU CAN. Go to Planned Parenthood right now and drop a little money in their bucket. Even if it's just $5. You can make a difference in the world. Go on. Show PP some righteous love. Be one of the people who help fight the darkness.

*You are victim blaming.

You're saying if she hadn't gone back, he wouldn't have raped her. I know it's not your intent, but be aware that you're literally saying the rape was predicated on her action. You are exactly putting the onus on her for his action by saying what made the difference was her poor judgment, not him being a rapist. I'm…

That's exactly what you just did.

She's adorable and seems fun, I like the cut of her jib.

Diabetics like myself get huge spikes from liquidized sugar of any type. The big greasy meal? Pretty good on the blood sugar, not so good for the obesity threat, obviously. I rarely eat fast food, but when I do, that's my kind of order.

Unilever has BIG plans:

My child is allergic to egg yolks. Thanks, Hellmann's, for bringing this product to my attention so I can purchase it.

Unilever doesn't own the rights to the word "mayonnaise." It is not a trademark. This is an FTC issue, not a Lantham Act issue.

That's actually a pretty popular opinion around here. I mean, it's wrong, but you're in good company.

Still funny. Will always be funny.

Our concern here is not about innovation, it is about misleading labelling," a Unilever spokesperson said in a statement Tuesday. "We simply wish to protect both consumers from being misled and also our brand."

You can't make an overly pedantic argument (Just Mayo is not misleading by any part of the Lantham Act — it is a pseudo-mayo product, the only difference being that it does not contain eggs and has never claimed to) and then turn around and say "btw, pedantic arguments that disagree with my own pedantic argument (e.g.…

I find it hard to believe they're trying to protect the good name of traditional mayo. There are all kinds of vegan products out there calling themselves mayo or mayonnaise.