I’m a 43 year old man. I have a daughter. How are such campus rules any different from me dictating who my adult child can and cannot sleep with?

Seems to me like the Feds are involved because it was a scheme that took in money from across state lines. If it only involved Florida residents and a violation of Florida law, I doubt the FBI would have give it a second glance.

If you want your wife or anyone else to fuck you in the absence of a quart of Pinot, you should reverse it. Women who say they like dadbod are proven liars.

Funner fact: While Tom’s Diner provided the exterior shot for Seinfeld, the diner in question was actually based on the Westway diner on 9th ave between 43rd and 44th. Seinfeld and Larry David both lived nearby at Manhattan Plaza in “artist” subsidized rental apartments.

I hear Katy Perry is recording her cover of Tracy Chapman’s “Fast Car” at this very moment.

Those kids are from Jersey and go to Tufts

Bill Belichick buries his victims in Mansfield and Attleboro. Never Walpole.

What doubt? He practically signed his name on the corpse.

My 2 year old son will eat dirt by the fistful and smile through the grit. Fuck this weak Doogie-spawn.

Not likely that your insurance co would have honored the policy in the event of an accident.

No. This article is 90% bullshit. A cop will pull you over wherever the fuck he wants. He will shoot you too and claim self defense.

Not to mention that he's almost certainly uninsured. So whatever mayhem his negligence causes is on the rest of us. Loser.

The melody was long considered to be the single copyrightable element of a song. About ten years ago with cases like (the former) Cat Stevens vs The Flaming Lips we started to see cases where the harmonic progression was (wrongly) considered a unique element of a song.

It's gotta get thrown out. The jury ignored its instructions.

I believe the old rule was that if every third note of a melody was different there was no infringement. The melodies of these two songs are completely different.

Apologies, I lumped you in with the chorus of people who think that since both songs are groovy, contain ambient party sounds and a cow bell, an expression of a copyrightable idea has been stolen. Even if the author shoots a little wide with the aggravating factors you cite, he's right that this verdict is a fucking…

So you're arguing that a cow bell is unique to Marvin Gaye?

It's not the same tempo. You have to adjust the speed to match them up. The bass line is part of the arrangement or the recording. Motown owns that. It is also not generally copyrightable, since it's typically the root notes of the progression.

Enligten us Brandeis. What were the copyrightable elements that were stolen?

Music will become like real estate. All songs will be credited to an LLC that is a subsidiary of another LLC and it will be impossibly costly to sue them.