The high risk of non-payment comes from the high cost of monthly payments.
The high risk of non-payment comes from the high cost of monthly payments.
Then what's the point of an insurance policy in the first place?
It’s the how the wheels line up with the body. The back extends past the rear wheels too far
Oh god... it’s so bad!! It looks like someone tried to convert a sedan to a hatchback using a Sawzall, a metal brake, and a can of yellow spray paint.
Hard to say. There’s a body of evidence that shows that other parts of the brain can take over for damaged sections, but on the other hand, these are pre-adolescent children. Their brains still have over a decade of development and growth.
Funny story: Scotland Yard’s first constable was fired on his first day for showing up drunk
As a civilian agency? Maybe. They'd probably hand the no-fly zones directly over to the Air Force
Wonder how much of that is just them wanting to stay in business
Eh, if it’s a plane chartered for campaign season, the pilot might not have a ton of experience flying out of DCA.
Vingroup’s got you covered either way
No, it says private equity in the post:
Private Equity, not venture capital
Oh, I'm sure Clearlake gained a lot
Wow. I already disliked Hoonigan, but to know that they were associated with “Starbucks For Pathetic Manbabies Who Buy MOLLE-Webbed Tactical Baby Carriers” is even worse
Only private equity could figure out a way to burn through capital faster than if they treated Bugattis the way Top Gear treated Hiluxes
Somebody make sure that Andy Weir doesn't see this tweet and subsequently beat his head in with a brick
Don't forget cops!
... Yeah. It’s not Southwest.
I propose, instead of litigating movies writ large, we instead focus on Bond movies, seeing as how they run the gamut from utterly fantastic to utter dreck. Therefore, per Bradley’s hypothesis, is it the trains that separate good Bond movies from bad Bond movies?