“I was explaining to you why, exactly, the statement of yours thatI quoted is wrong.”

“If it was only a harassment campaign then it had nothing to do with video games”

“I am a minority”

I’m not the one who wrote “toro.” I copied and pasted what the other guy wrote, mistakes and all.

I didn’t say “meat slaughtering.” Is reading hard for you?

You lost. Cry harder.

“As far as I understand Gamergate was a reaction against both progressive criticism of video games as well as more diversity in video games themselves”

Me: “Is reading too hard for you?”

Um, I didn’t say game characters have rights or expectations. What are you even responding to?

“if we’re going to have a broader discussion”

You just moved the goalposts. We were talking about “the game he wanted to make.” You gave up your argument at lightning speed.

“Are you saying video games actually CAUSED”

“He does a lot of his stuff mostly for himself”

“Seriously... who cares?”

“If you think a panty peek is the worst thing that Taro has done”

Wait until you figure out that killing characters in video games doesn’t lead people to kill in real life, but objectification in video games reinforces real life objectification.

The issue here isn’t merely sexualized outfits or voyeurism, but the incentive to objectify a woman by violating her privacy.

It’s not hypocrisy. I literally just said one set has no correlation and the other set does have a correlation. For example, remember Gamergate? Remember how video games never led to a mass uprising of murderous shooters, but it did lead to a mass uprising of misogynist assholes harassing women?

Stop blaming the women and start blaming the creeps, fucko.

“Creeps like me?”