Or perhaps people shouldn't jump down someone's throat at the thought of a differing opinion before realizing what said opinion actually consists of!

Again, the point of my post was to share my opinion. I then followed it up with a hope of having a coherent discussion. Whether my original post was good at conveying this point is up for debate.

Oh my, Justin Trudeau. Isn't that the guy who got worldwide criticism for praising Castro?

1. "A long long past of deceitful editing" includes one previous account. That sure is a long, long past……….

Please read all my other posts after the original and stop trying to tell me what my original post/point was.

1. BLM, while their overarching cause was to bring light to injustices and plights on the black community, had a major undercurrent of hate towards police. "What do we want, DEAD COPS! When do we want them, NOW!" is not something said by a peaceful organization.

My new point, to you and only you, is you are a closeted Trump supporter. Pure and simple.

I completely agree that while that may dissuade the fact he mocked a disabled reporter, it's still a wrong thing to do in general and I mentioned that in my other comments as well. For better or worse (and it's most definitely the latter), he makes those gestures when mocking anyone.

"… Found that conservatives find most art to be way too liberal…"

I appreciate you bringing light to those of us Trump voters who are not what many want to deem as bigoted white supremacists. While we may not agree on things, the disabled reporter mocking being one, it's refreshing to have a civil discussion in the midst of all these other comments I am receiving.

"You're a stupid shallow thinker…"
"… Who I tower above intellectually."
"… Opinions of idiots…"
"You're meaningless…"
"… I don't value your opinion or thoughts."

Who am I calling out? I knew what I was getting myself into when I commented what I did on this website. I am simply sharing my opinion and looking for people who want to have a coherent, concise discussion regarding it.

1. Again, just because the leaders of a movement are non-violent does not mean their subordinates who commit violence in the name of their group don't share blame. Similar to the "alt-right". Liberals media love tie that group to Republicans/Trump supporters as a whole, when really that faction represents a minute…

Share my opinion. That's what comment sections are for, right? Or am I missing something?

This is an incredibly well-put, well-thought out response and I commend you for voicing your opinion in the face of all the vitriol on this website. I agree with many things you just said, especially regarding BLM. It's not their cause I have an issue with, as it's a completely legit and valid argument they were…

I am walking away, and I am right. At least you got me to do one of the two things!

Wow - let's take a look at some things you just said:

If I was upset to be outside of my special safe space, I certainly wouldn't have come to the lions den.

"The only states that matter are those who share my same opinion!"

Michael Moore. Don't even get me started.