Or, just use Tixati like people who know what the hell they're doing do.
Or, just use Tixati like people who know what the hell they're doing do.
The questions I get are pretty good, too. "Is that a duct tape band-aid!?"
I actually have those. They are awesome.
Helium is actually running very low in supply - and that's a pretty serious subject the Army and Navy are going to have to look into if they're going to continue the blimp program much longer (the Navy has blimps now too). As for voice changing - there aren't any humans in it, and helium rises. ;)
Here's one I made a long time ago of a certain Pats fullback making a very improbable kick return.
I don't think you're understanding me... even all of its friends in the magazine, and all of its extended relatives in other magazines surrounding it, aren't going to realistically affect this blimp. We're talking millions of cubic yards of helium. A few hundred half-inch holes aren't going to make a difference.
Go fuck yourself, McAfee.
Easier said than done... lol
You would be absolutely amazed at how little a tiny little bullet hole affects a 300-ft long blimp. It affects it about not even a little bit. Incendiary ammunition was designed in the first place because WW1 fighters were just emptying thousands of rounds into German Zeppelins with little to no effect - so they made…
Google ACLS - that's the system it (and any other plane that lands on a carrier) uses. There is an antenna on the ship that measures its speed and movement and transmits that information to the aircraft, whose own pulse decoder and receiver translates that information into power and control surface movements. It's all…
"Honey, does that wing say One large Farva on it!?"
Because safety!
I would really like to see you try, because I think you're full of shit here.
The AIM-9X is a very well-tested missile; the aim (if you'll excuse the word pun) is not to test the missile itself, but its interaction with the F-22. More specifically, its interaction while in supersonic flight.
An early-aughts fighter shooting a late-70s* missile, captured using a mid-90s image technology.
I note with some amusement that you could time-warp back to the late 70s, replace F-22 with [block 0] F-16 and F-35 with F-111 and the argument would still be the same. The more things change...
Just out of sheer curiosity - how does one guide a fire-and-forget missile? I mean, it's pretty much built into its name that you don't have to guide it.
Yeah, I tried for a while to come up with something witty, but then I just decided the best thing to do would be to somehow combine the uncertain vagaries and tribulations of rogue nuclear weapons production and enrichment, and also insipid pop music.
Though, to be fair, at least you didn't use a Burner account like most of the rest of the chickenshits. I really don't even know what they're trying to hide. Nobody cares about their identity.
OH NOES I LOST MAH INTERNETZ CREDUBILITEH