IF HE IS A THREAT, THEN RE-READ THE FIRST SENTENCE.

If you are actually asking, I believe it is The 8th Amendment. If you just want to alleviate your aggression, I hope it worked. 

This from a person who says advocating for bail is only defensible, not given but only fucking defensible, if the case dictates it. Wtf is the matter with you. Psycho. 

Ok. Here I go...

You know, if this comment were attached to a case in which the defendant actually did pose no danger to the public, that would be a defensible point to make.

Gonna be a birth spike in 9 months. 

Have your kid or nieces explain to you what ‘unless’ means. Then come back to us.

Correct. Only shorties.

These are probably the same people who scream about Trump calling for the death penalty in the Central Park Five case.

It is a constitutional right.

Then those reasons should be presented and he should be denied bail on those grounds.

I did kind of roll that up into danger to public, but I guess I could have been more explicit. 

Your user name is apropos.

Yes. Everyone who doesn’t toe your exact line is a troll. I got it. Why even have a trial.

You called...

Then that is why he should be denied bail. And not because he has a beautiful townhouse that he would stay. 

Or we change how bail is set for lower income people. Either way, I am fine with it.

Yes

Those aren’t mythical. They are real.

Unless he poses a danger to the public, he should be afforded the opportunity of bail. Everyone should, no exceptions.