I ain’t gonna say ‘no’ to good tentacle porn.

If ‘batarang up the ass’ isn’t an interrogation option I’m gonna be very disappoint.

If they do change mid-battle, I demand fully animated magical-boy & magical-girl transformation sequences.

The good news is, ScarJo is no stranger to nude scenes.

I do not believe the arguements and mental gymnastics of someone who needed this much hand-holding to be worth much merit, especially after you have resorted to personal insults repeatedly despite warnings.

It was used by Mudbud to insult a specific gender, men, ergo its a gendered insult. That was the most recent check.

If it wasn’t clear enough, I apologize. I didn’t think anyone would need as much hand-holding as you do.

Are you sure that quote was from Riki? You might want to click the link that accompanied it, and while you’re at it read the rest of the links too since I’m pretty sure you haven’t done that yet.

I’ve been using the flag option for a while now, and while Kotaku has been pretty good about keeping gendered insults directed at women either in the greys or shadowbanned outright, I do not feel the same moderation is being applied to gendered insults directed at men.

Nope. She never said one way or another that she considers crude compliments regarding her boobs to be an insult nor degrading, and I never quoted her as saying such. If I did, you’re free to link to the comment where I said such.

I only do this as a last resort. I attempted to confront Mudbud directly first, but he dismissed my replies so direct discourse is not an option.

The context of Mudbud’s toxic behaviour is all preserved in the links I provided, but you are right in pointing out that I didn’t provide sufficient context for my quote from Riki.

Boobs denote gender, but commenting on them is not necessarily an insult. I do not deal with “potentials” and “what-ifs”. If I can’t tell for sure that someone mentioned boobs with the intent to insult, and I do not know the recipient’s view on the matter, then I do not assume anything.

You could accuse me of lying regarding Riki’s joke if you wish. It would be extremely difficult, if not outright impossible, for me to track down the exact moment Riki made that joke about herself because it was a reply to a concerned fan’s comment on a Facebook photo she posted several years ago.

I do not know your co-worker, so I wouldn’t presume to know anything about how they view things. In the highly unlikely event that I do know their viewpoints I would take it into consideration, but until then I only look at the intent of the commentor.

I have a few names I can recall, I just choose not to mention them because, again, I don’t name and shame beyond individual articles. There’s no reason to drag someone’s prior toxic behaviour out when they haven’t done anything wrong in the present.

I don’t excuse any hateful sexist statement. Even if you don’t have a problem with sexist remarks that degrades an entire gender like “trillby wearing babyman”, I do, so I’m calling it out.

I avoid naming and shaming beyond individual article comment sections, because if anyone improves their behaviour and stops being toxic then I see no reason to drag anything out.

I try to make a distinction between clumsy and crass statements of appreciation versus clear intent to belittle and degrade.

I generally do not tolerate any form of sexism or toxicity, however Kotaku is pretty good about shadowbanning anyone who repeatedly uses gendered insults targeting women so I have no qualms there.