Your breeding a ton of dogs so that you can use them in that short window of peak physicality and then disposing of them because no one wants to own a greyhound as a pet. And your talking about a sport with a TON of money that uses animals, getting the abuse is out is impossible. You’ve literally made abuse lucrative.

totally believe it was an error. But if I made that error, I’d definitely have a solid “ohhhh, shit. I really fucked up here and I am sorry.” Which, I assume, a teacher can say without swearing. Me, not so much.

And it has Cosmo on the cover. I’d watch that guy knit for 6 hours, and it would be the tensest 6 hours of my life.

Eh, im an 07 and i love costco. One strange reason: there meats are WAY better than a grocery store and way cheaper. Their steaks are on par with the specialty butchers around me, and about half the price.

Yes. I know this. He did not. But he does now, and the lesson fortunately did not cost him anything but pride.

I can’t believe the number of friends and family that seem reasonable if not intelligent that fall for this stuff.

Right, but you don’t know that until after it’s filmed. 6 months before that special was right at her peak (not everyone knew it at the time), but she had just run out of material. 4 years of a show on top of standup and movies drains the comedic value. Even Chappelle was running on fumes at the end of his show.

Yea, it’s a dumb argument because your saying it comes down to “They are paying me 1/40th of what they paid Chapelle, when they should be paying me 1/30th”.

Don’t be ridiculous. The NFL beers are WAY more expensive.

Brady’s contract is almost entirely guaranteed. They gain very little from cutting him, and he designed it that way. I totally agree that you COULD have kept both of them, but its very clear that although it mathematically works, it would have made no sense.

That’s a huge assumption, and its counter to what the team who trades for him is getting. In 2017- browns trade a #1 pick, get a guy with 1 year left on his rookie contract, they pay him peanuts for 1 year and have 1 year to lock him up on a long term deal.

He’d have no choice While. Under. The. Tag. Which lasts 1 year, at the end of which the Pats have nothing. That’s what I’m saying. You can make the math work if you’re only interested in year #1. After year #1, you’ve got no QB contract, a QB who you’ve franchised against his wishes, zero trade value (because again,…

Right, but banner openly admits that this all makes sense if you can keep Garop, not if you only get 1 year from him:

But the path your taking is merely delaying the decision they made by 1 more year, and spending $25M to do it. Sure, you’re hoping brady breaks down early or gets horribly injured, but all you’ve done is:

But you don’t have any trade value because you don’t have a contract with him. You’ve got the same trade value you had when they turned down the Browns deal. You’ve gained nothing other than a year with a really expensive backup who is ticked off that you won’t let him play.

Wait, what? Spending that much on 2 QBs makes no sense if you don’t think either one has a future with the team. That’s just flushing your money away.

Franchising Garapolo doesn’t do much to keep him around long term if it pisses him off. They offered him longer term deals over $15m a year. It seems pretty clear he wanted to start, and that wasn’t an option until Brady falls apart or gets injured (something he has been historically good at avoiding).

I wore gloves during sex once, so I understand Brady’s annoyance with all the questions.

Hey, there are a TINY (and i mean tiny) percentage of us that are self-aware.

Deep down, you care. and it keeps me warm at night.