Exactly this.

Tough call. Critics are paid to evaluate a movie, and they all (all being most) say it’s awful. People who saw the movie are saying they enjoyed it, but that doesn’t mean it’s a good movie. It just means they enjoyed it and/or had a good time watching it. Some (maybe even the majority) might believe it’s a good movie,…

Do you think Hitler believed he was doing evil? No. He thought he was doing good. Osama Bin Laden believed he was taking down the “infidels.”

That’s cool that they did that. It must be a lot of work, though. I know everyone likes to make light of Ubisoft and their “too hard to animate” excuse, but if you’re actually making a female character that people legitimately react to, it does require a lot of double work.

As a movie, Prince of Persia was actually fairly good. I enjoyed it. It was funny at times. It told a cohesive story.

No. A good movie is one that most people would agree is a good movie. Sites like RT make this easy for us to see.

I’m not sure I like that. Currently, Tracers can move around pretty well unmolested if they’re good. Even I have gone on these huge runs as Tracer (and I’m not that good with Tracer) until a Winston or Widow took me out.

I don’t think she needs a buff, TBH. I mean, she’s a pretty average character in mech with a devastating ultimate.

Yeah. It’s just how things go sometimes.

Exactly this. As I was just telling him, I win most fights against Hanzo as a Widowmaker. Because she shoots faster and more accurately over a long distance. You can get a body shot and then follow up with a really quick finisher (doesn’t need to fully charge). Hanzo can’t do this.

Man, I don’t know what you’re complaining about. When playing as Widow, I’ll admit that I’ve lost to Hanzo. But that’s not most of the time. Most of the time, I kill Hanzo easily. Because even if I don’t get the headshot, I usually hit a body shot, and a second, not-fully-charged shot is more than enough to finish the…

....I did. It’s the way you’re behaving. You know how you perceive the typical Jezebel commenter? Liberal, irrational, etc.

I didn’t characterize you as a chauvinist. I characterized you as someone a “Jezebellian” would characterize as a chauvinist. You are their caricature same as what a “Jezebellian” is to you or I.

Is it you? No. That makes no sense. Is it the Blizzard employee?

Never played this one. Is it awful? But I remember NES Batman games (based on Tim Burton’s movies), and they were really fun back then. And the Arkham Knight games are also a whole lot of fun.

I thought the story is basically that Overwatch was broken up years ago, and the various members have moved on since then. Some being mercenaries or whatever, and others just doing their thing. Now they’re all kinda coming back together, but not really, so they just end up siding on whatever side they want to be on at…

I’m not at all sure about this, to be honest.

Most people don’t switch because they’re either too noob or too focused on surmounting their adversary with their chosen character. I’ve been in a party with someone who just kept on insisting to tackle a stage with Pharah. Because Pharah was going to be the way or whatever.

And I’m repeatedly telling you that he can’t be. He is completely unable to counter Bastion.

As a Reinhardt main, I just can’t disagree with you enough. I’ve beaten Bastions, but that’s because they sucked. And what you’re suggesting is them sucking. Bastion takes like a second to reload. I started a charge at a Bastion once, he was shooting me, ran out of bullets, I’m not dead and still charging, he reloads…