GoT is successful and it looks great, but I wouldn't say it has great writing…

It's already starting. She about to comment on Donnie's clothes, and her introduction, where she started with "I live deep" and ended with the suburbs. I think Fee's appreciation of her role and lie in the portrait is bringing her back.

Fee's speech is definitely going to my favourite TV scenes.

They want to give BB a chance at remaining the best version of that story.

Ha, this guy has nothing to do against the Spanish counterpart
https://www.google.es/amp/w…

Well, I mean, his face pretty much said everything. It was the moment to apologise and give him some room, not to keep pressing with his unoriginal question.

Logan would make more sense.

CBS should just pay the guys from Star Trek Continues, whose show is already going.

I think the film is being praised because it managed to communicate what it intended to, in this case with minimal budget and runtime.

It gave me the vibe of limit-testing, as if she was testing the limits of her power over those who were men, but socially under her. Still, the power is not hers, it's her husband's, but she can use it to a degree.

But it does.

She was bored and frustrated and wanted the exhilaration of danger. She had the "safety" of being the one in a position of power despite being a woman, so she got herself into danger for the rush.

Well, we have John Wick.
But I liked this movie, a sequel is ok.

Worse than the best but better than the worst is 100% "eh it was fine" territory.

Well, Steve is a human, Diana is an amazon demigoddess, I'd say he is weaker.

YES, that caught my attention too.

That translated to the screen so much better than I expected!

Roald Dahl's tone is difficult to translate to the screen, though, or at least I find that the adaptations are great but rarely quite so dark.

I liked it, even though I don't think it was great (if I had to grade it, I'd say a 7 maybe), but I don't think it's the best example of a particularly well-developed character. I don't think it does justice to the book, though. But the book was difficult to adapt.

Yes, just maybe not the best example to "defend" Spielberg in this area.