i was thinking of exactly that when i wrote the nonverbal part ;)
i was thinking of exactly that when i wrote the nonverbal part ;)
THIS!
jinni, you are doing even more excellent commenting today (and you’re always great)
i would also *really* like this to lead to a reevaluation of recommended supplement dosages during pregnancy, since assuming these parents are taking essentially just what their doctors are prescribing and ending up with blood test values that are way too high, we need to start by recalibrating the dose.
how “bloom” reads to me:
oh shit, you didn’t expect me to TOUCH one, did you?
you articulated it nicely, as well
nyu for grad and undergrad. my partner at the time was working on her phD in a physical science department and got just about every stupid sexist line in the book. i will attest that medicine, biology, you name the field, this has happened to probably every nondude around. in fact, 2 of my departments, politcal…
maybe you will hate me (that’s how things work in the interwebs comments) for saying this, maybe not... i have SUCH similar feelings for dawkins as i do for sanders and i only just realized it: yes, i agree with 90% of what you say but i just can’t stand how you’re going about saying it!
appropriate kinja name is appropriate!
yeah not helping pls try again or maybe don’t
ok, pls explain how nearly every workplace of mine in philly (south, north — NOT NORTHEAST DEAR GOD NOT NORTHEAST) someone was always bringin bags of pretzel factory crap in and they would sit out for days and still be exactly the same and lord all the mustard they’d include like a bottle for each pretzel and what…
hate to break it to you, but this is a napoleon
on a personal note, i’d like to thank you for not having a non-i phone and keeping it reasonably charged.
1. because!
his demeanor is equally if not more alarming, with the unblinking, slightly unfocused stare of a 14-year-old playing Jesus Christ in a youth group production.
fuuuuuuuck
seriously 1,000,000 hundred percent and forever amen.
i don’t know anything about his policies or proclivities, but as an obama nom — assuming the legislature won’t give him a hearing, because come on — wouldn’t garland be passed over in favor of the choice of whoever gets elected? or do dems inherit prior dems’ nominees?