Good for them!

I think comparing this to the #metoo movement is pretty offensive to the movement that is based around sexual harassment. The grid girls were not forced to do this and they are also being paid to be there as well.

Yeah, tariff imbalances seem like the kind of thing one should raise a stink over, especially when the side with the high tariffs is already known for undercutting with knockoffs and lack of labor laws.

It’ll have something the Tesla doesn’t have. Build quality.

Possible : Looks better , Drives better?

All social media. It has made the majority of human kind insufferable selfish assholes. It provides anonymous echo chambers for any belief system. That’s not remotely a good thing.

You are right, in that if we lived in a world where Twitter went out of business it would mean that most of the people in that world didn’t give a shit about Twitter and that’s a world I want to live in.

He’s a concept guy. He’s not big on the details of execution. That’s exactly the kind of people social media appeals to most. We’ve all known that guy that wants to tell everyone about his genius solution to everything but can’t be bothered to hash out the finer details. He’s just happy showing everyone how smart [he…

Airlifting parts, THAT is the road to profitability. It doesn’t matter how many they make, if they lose a fortune on every one of them. You actually can’t make it up in volume, you know.

As with anyone who’s ever read a jezebel article, objectification is fine, as long as it is done about Jon Hamm’s hog in sweat pants or Jason Mamoa’s abs. Based on that logic, equitable objectification seems okay, but I’m taking my cues from a leading feminist blog, so what do I know.

Short sellers have been bashing TSLA for years, and they have been on losing side of that argument time after time. There have been plenty of them since well before the stock even hit $100 a share. They want bad publicity around the company, so they can stop getting burned on their bad investments.

While yes, he is an asshole, I find this sentence unnecessarily harsh. I work in Audit, and one of the changes post Enron is examining “tone from the top” - whether or not the implied tone of ethics coming from the C-Level team dictates pressure to commit fraud. Though it does not absolve personal responsibility, it…

god this makes me cringe so hard. “we took all the worst parts of software development and are introducing them to all industries” seems to be the “disruption” angle of so many silicon valley companies.

Digital renders, wild performance claims, no timeline, Tesla. I’m sure Tesla fully plans on making this and that it can hit those performance metrics. I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for it though.

It is funny to watch people enchanted by Musk’s Jobsian Reality-Distortion Field have opinions on major, multi-national equipment manufacturer strategy. Even better when they have no idea how heavy industry works. let alone logistics, or engineering.

“everyone should be considerate and be alert and careful”

So...aside from the position of the rotors, how is this any different from a helicopter?

Isn’t the reason reporters use allegedly so they can’t be sued for libel? I understand the frustration but the way our legal system works we have to give perpetrators their day in court

From the article linked above:

Religion.