You're absolutely right. She buried her “apology” in something like the 9th paragraph of a blog post whose title spoke only about the wrongdoings of Rolling Stone. An actual apology would have been given equal dignity to her original post.
You're absolutely right. She buried her “apology” in something like the 9th paragraph of a blog post whose title spoke only about the wrongdoings of Rolling Stone. An actual apology would have been given equal dignity to her original post.
“I admire you for always critically examining your own work—both in this case and beyond.”
And what makes you think that any “big check” the US hypothetically cuts will be used on refugees?
You'd also have to look into what the make up is of the people who apply to law school in the first place. (I.e., what does the pool look like?)
There are probably even less when you look at the route judges typically take to take there: top end schools all the way, partners at big law firms for a while.
I'd buy this argument more if his religion could somehow be divorced from the concepts of hatred to gays and to women. Of course it can't. And that's how his religion is practiced in all the countries of the world that practice his religion.
Get real. Peter Thiel didn't invent the facts of the lawsuit or award the damages to Hogan. Maybe Gawker should get a new General Counsel ... Someone who can actually manage risk unlike Hearher Dietrick.
They’re also free to be sued each and every time they eject a student. One of these students will win eventually and, when that student does, it will be for a whole ton of money.
Its called normalizing, its been studied over and over again, its instinctual and normal reaction, and when are we going to accept this as a fact?
The great internet outrage machine is great at having anonymous people sit behind their computers and tear things down ... it’s not so good at coming up with quality replacements for the things it tears down.
After getting 60,000 clicks yesterday (and the revenue associated with that) from a blog post that showed text messages where Depp’s assistant purportedly acknowledged that Depp had attacked Amber Heard (http://jezebel.com/alleged-texts-…), it turns out that those messages were totally fabricated with no date or time…
After getting 60,000 clicks yesterday (and the revenue associated with that) from a blog post that showed text messages where Depp’s assistant acknowledged that Depp had attacked Amber Heard (http://jezebel.com/alleged-texts-…), it turns out that those messages were totally fabricated of course with no date or time…
Don’t be sad, the texts are fake ...
Ruh roh ... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3…
Ok, even assuming the makeup theory, I still find it incredibly odd that there was absolutely zero evidence of injury on May 20, when the police were called. Plenty of people in the comments have said that bruises show up later, but that’s different than establishing that there would be no visible evidence of injury…
I’d be interested in hearing from an actual medical expert on the point of whether the bruises shown in the photos could have been entirely invisible when the police showed up. As in “no evidence of injury whatsoever.” I get that bruises can (and do) develop over time, but it’s quite another thing to say that there’s…
This is a risk management problem. The role of the GC is to assume the worst and protect the company from it. Here, Gawker’s GC was one of two to keep the Conde Nast post up. She wasn't doing her job. This wasn't some kind of unforeseen risk. Instead, not only did Gawker post multiple videos like the Hogan one, it…
Kesha actually denied under oath that any alleged sexual abuse ever took place. So her credibility on this issue is completely shot. Before she testified, she took an oath and agreed to tell the truth during the deposition. Now she says that she didn’t tell the truth. Who are we to believe and why: Kesha under oath…
Hahahaha ... good one!!!!