Don’t be sad, the texts are fake ...
HairyPalmer1
hairypalmer1
Ruh roh ... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3…
Ok, even assuming the makeup theory, I still find it incredibly odd that there was absolutely zero evidence of injury on May 20, when the police were called. Plenty of people in the comments have said that bruises show up later, but that’s different than establishing that there would be no visible evidence of injury…
I’d be interested in hearing from an actual medical expert on the point of whether the bruises shown in the photos could have been entirely invisible when the police showed up. As in “no evidence of injury whatsoever.” I get that bruises can (and do) develop over time, but it’s quite another thing to say that there’s…
This is a risk management problem. The role of the GC is to assume the worst and protect the company from it. Here, Gawker’s GC was one of two to keep the Conde Nast post up. She wasn't doing her job. This wasn't some kind of unforeseen risk. Instead, not only did Gawker post multiple videos like the Hogan one, it…
Kesha actually denied under oath that any alleged sexual abuse ever took place. So her credibility on this issue is completely shot. Before she testified, she took an oath and agreed to tell the truth during the deposition. Now she says that she didn’t tell the truth. Who are we to believe and why: Kesha under oath…
Hahahaha ... good one!!!!
Even the article you cite to (on a number of occasions) shows that a substantial number of women were assaulted by people whose background wasn’t German. That’s a fact. Where’s your cite showing that the railway company is singling out Syrians (you don’t have one) and not just concerned that Germany is, in fact, a…
Where are you finding a group with “often differing” opinions?
“it’s not a land where men “view women as objects for their use and pleasure” — at least no more than the USA or Europe.”
I’m enjoying how when Gawker’s own flaming demise is the breaking news, it takes its sweet ass time and then a thoughtful analysis as to what to post next.
and she steals jokes ...
In other news, people who have no understanding of a legal proceeding are confused by events in a legal proceeding.
Too bad he didn’t leak a videotape of it, so that Gawker could post it against her wishes and profit to the tune of 15 million.
As awful as Donald is, I bet even he wouldn’t have posted this video unlike Gawker ... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3…
Treating women like shit seems to be the subtext for the Gawker family of blogs as well ... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3…
Probably not. (source: see Gene Munster’s much publicized predictions about an “Apple TV”)
Ah yes, wasn’t Gene Munster the guy who basically guaranteed an Apple TV year after year ... Yeah, his record’s pretty good on this type of thing, I'm sure he'll be right this time ...
The assumption here is that Jezebel has some interest in getting stories “right” versus generating clicks (and playing up outrage) for ad revenue. I don’t think they do. One of their favorite types of stories is the “OMFG, Walmat blames Tracy Morgan’s injuries on Tracy Morgan!1!1!” where Walmart does nothing more than…