Of course it’s not a “typo” at all, is it. A “typo” is something like “Californis,” which is pretty understandable because the “s” key is right next to the “a” key on the keyboard. Here, you’re purporting to give a valid opinion about a legal proceeding and it turns out, you’re really not the right person to be doing…
HairyPalmer1
hairypalmer1
Try looking into how far you get with a “practical admission” in a legal proceeding ...
Jezebel: Where you go to meet hundreds of other internet commenters and exchange ideas EXACTLY like the ones you have.
Tough talk by completely anonymous internet commenters is the toughest type of talk.
I never use Siri, but I just bought a 2016 Passat with CarPlay and find myself using Siri quite a bit because the iPhone itself is stashed away in a closed compartment, so your only real option is to use CarPlay (ie, I can’t just start typing something in).
Sure, I was going to get that car anyway and just waited for the 2016 because of a number of new features, one of which was CarPlay. That said, I'm not real big fan of 3rd party, after market equivalents so I'm good with the one that came with the car.
I waited specifically for the 2016 models to come out and bought a new Passat the other day ... CarPlay is a fantastic feature.
“... and I do think the SAO overcharged in the instance.” That reminds me, where has Marilyn Mosby been? She certainly didn’t actually try this case.
The case against this officer has problems. From an NYT article:
Actually his defense doesn’t really rest on that. Porter testified that he didn’t see the directive that came out a few days before making seat belting mandatory (I don’t believe that that testimony was ever contradicted); the general practice in the department wasn’t to seatbelt people in vans because of safety…
You might be right, but the local law professor who is covering the case thinks it’s going to be complicated.
Porter testified that he didn’t see the directive that came out a few days before making seat belting mandatory (and I don’t believe that that testimony was ever contradicted); the general practice in the department wasn’t to seatbelt people in vans because of safety concerns; Porter knew that Gray had tried to escape…
Actually his defense doesn’t really rest on that. Porter testified that he didn’t see the directive that came out a few days before making seat belting mandatory (I don’t believe that that testimony was ever contradicted); the general practice in the department wasn’t to seatbelt people in vans because of safety…
In other news, anonymous internet commenter passionately stands up for right of blog to intentionally and actively mislead readership on senstive social justice issues.
So, is Jezebel ever going to follow up down the line on this story to let us know how the allegations panned out? Or is it just list the allegations and move on ...
The entire 1st two paragraphs and title continue to misstate what happened, giving the reader the thought that these are opinions that Scalia came up with. He’s was addressing arguments in an amicus curiae brief. If you had any integrity, the article should be re-written to correctly state what actually happened and…
Sure, and since there’s absolutely zero objective criteria listed by Gawker (or anyone else) as to when to use the dismiss button, it’s really just become the “delete opinions I don’t like “ button.
Do they also pull guns out of waistbands and start to point them at officers who have their guns drawn in Toledo?