hagelt18
Tarman
hagelt18

I answered that in the post...Would you do something to help people if you knew they’d give you hell for it? It seems reasonable enough to me that it isn’t worth my effort.

Good. I wish this was a socially acceptable thing to do let alone fashionable in the US. If I wore a mask to work for a cold people would laugh at me. Its not that I care that much, but I its not worth doing something nice only to get laughed at.

They’re offering the game for $60, which feels off—doesn’t this seem like a free-to-play game?

Ahhhh, thank you. I didn’t realize that. I’m not able to watch the video at the moment.

I remember a group doing something similar a while back. I think its a cool idea.

Did you try to get a police report?

I don’t know I got some pretty nice stuff over the years.

I got nice dioramas, playing cards, a t-shirt, a music CD, and several high value digital games. Granted I preferred the physical rewards that less available in the last two years.

People are having a really hard time understanding your comment... =\

Now playing

“From an economical standpoint however, completely based on statistics, we can already see that the Black Market update is working as we intended”

I can’t tell if maybe you are just responding to a different comment. We are on very different pages right now.

Most comments like that aren’t reactions to the video itself, it’s the title and the opening line in the article that triggered these reactions. These weapons have a readily available set of stats including an Accuracy Range stat indicating higher and lower accuracy values for different weapons. How else would anyone

Guns have an accuracy stat for a reason. The title and opening line of this article seem to imply that the results of these stats are in some way unusual or special.

It is cool that someone would take the time to demonstrate those stats though.

Don’t we all see enough poorly made levels? This level is trash. You should feel bad enough for getting played by it. Why go beyond that and put all this effort into an article about it? Why can’t you do something helpful and promote quality levels instead?

There are a lot of really great levels out there that struggle to find their way beyond the garbage levels. For some reason Kotaku feels the need to exasperate this issue by sharing junk like this.

PSA: You can get an external HDD.

I’m glad they made the system this way. The system would undoubtedly cost more if it came with a 500GB HDD. Hard drives cost half as much now as they did in 2012. Additionally I can choose which type of hard drive I want...HDD, Hybrid, SSD. I can choose the size.

That’s a hell of a lot

Now playing

There’s only one way to know for sure...We shall use my largest scales!

I really hope some lessons were learned. I’m sure this won’t be the last mario maker. It has been a great first entry but there are so many ways it could be improved and expanded upon.

Have you seen NintendoLife’s mario maker web app for sharing levels? It’s easily the nicest looking place for sharing courses I’ve seen so far. Its still growing but they have a fair number of submissions on there already.

http://www.nintendolife.com/super-mario-ma…