I guess the writers last saw a game in early 2015.

Why does Jez refer to her correctly as “Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall” but still insists on saying “Kate Middleton”? 

Big names bomb all the time. It can be orthogonal to other issues.

I think your factors are real, but you are giving whitewashing too much weight. Most of the target audience wouldn’t care (particularly given the endorsement of the original creators). Sometimes a bad movie is a bad movie

I was just thinking that this would be a condition of my agreement to participate...

My firm actually has pretty strict training on what you are allowed to ask and not ask candidates with a refresher course each fall before fall recruiting.

They are sorta like Madonna...so famous they don’t need a last name. Though technically it is Mountbatten-Windsor, the Windsor part was made up in the early 20th century. Traditionally, they sometimes use the territorial designation as a last name. For example, when William was in the military he was William Wales. …

You Philistine!

the proper way to refer to her is: Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, or Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Cambridge 

+ 1000 stars

This article is a great illustration of the old adage about fools and their money. Wow, I really should have gone into the scam business, it is much more lucrative than working for a living.

yeah, that alone tells you the doctor should lose his license to practice, if he has a real one to begin with.

Even though I still don’t see it that way, I appreciate your view and the manner in which you shared it.

You used the word “sad” that means you are obviously a Trump supporter. Oh wait, maybe that isn’t what you meant. Is it possible? No, it must be the one interpretation I’ve come up with as the only possible one. He’s a buffoon and generally incompetent, but he is the press secretary and smart enough not to say…

but the latter is something the right has been saying in a snide way for decades like a broken record as a way of deflecting protests or criticism. Seems like we should entertain the idea that it was focused on the standard playbook than on an evil threat to somehow kick her out of the country in the form of the old…

sure, but bullying and openly racist are not the same thing. We know they are hostile to any criticism. But that is why the argument fits. It is the “why do you hate America” line of argument from the Bush admin.

I don’t know his history, but voicing a different opinion does not make someone a troll. Again, it is using catchall terms devoid of their original intent. There was nothing harassing in the OP nor particularly inflammatory. I took it as having some valid points and some invalid points, but certainly nothing that…

well thank you for adding to the conversation in a helpful way. By the way, if that means I can’t see it, doesn’t that mean Spicer doesn’t either? Do you deny that many people particularly conservatives and military have been using a form of that adage for decades to deflect criticism?

maybe it is just because I lack sensitivity to the issue by not being a minority, but when I hear Spicer it sounds like he is in-artfully saying that America is so great that that it lets people voice their opposing views without risk of retaliation or harm, which has not been true in many places over the years. Sure…

I’m sure I’ll get shit for stepping into this, but the problem with lists of “things that lead to fascism” is that they tend to be generic for the most part that you can correlate with many other things. To think that the fascism argument is overblown does not mean someone is a Trump supporter. Instead, I think it is…