I figured you were being sassy...no need for us to get into a fight over it

that was kinda the point

It depends a lot on what the cow was eating though

It only has A, D, and E if it has been fortified. You can just fortify a bottle of water.

when was the last time you squeezed an almond and got white juice?

“when the people so obviously wanted something different.” I don’t think the facts support this conclusion. The moderate candidate generally wins because they need moderate voters, which make up a much larger proportion than either progressives or alt-right folks. Unless Stein gets more votes now than the last few…

No one else is responsible that is running for president because nobody else running has ever held elected office other than Gary Johnson.

I didn’t claim that she can’t be held responsible at all. However, much as in legal liability, someone has to be the proximate cause to be liable for it. If you remove her enough from the actual decision-making it is just petting to call her responsible. Secretary of state has no legal authority over any military…

of course this entire conversation is academic. Stein is not going to win a single electoral vote. The choice in this election is between Trump or Clinton. You may decide to throw away your vote.

Now who isn’t reading? I never said you couldn’t criticize her foreign policy choices. You said her warmongering was “responsible” for dead children. I asked how you define responsibility (the answer seems to be in a way that places a higher responsibility on Clinton than on others with a more direct role in events).

Dog whistles to a group allow one to say they are not “against” vaccines...not she is just “raising questions” about their safety. Humm, “even if Stein were anti-vaxx” there were far far more child deaths due to easily preventable diseases pre-vaccine than you can pin on Hillary. So she is as much of an advocate for…

Interesting that you consider going undercover to identify civil rights violations in 1972 as “pandering”

“Her political career didn’t start until 1998" Wikipedia puts her first run at elective office in 2002, but we’ll be charitable and give you 98 (when she was 48 years old). What elective offices has she held ? Oh yes, she was on a town council of a town of 30 thousand people. Clearly that is presidential preparation…

Jill Stein? I think she writes off the rich. Doesn’t the president have to represent them too? I’d like to see any actual quote of hers identifying the humanity of mass killers and child molesters. I’m certain you have one handy. She also writes off immunocompromised individuals with her anti-vax stance and also…

The president can’t write off mass murderers? terrorists? child molesters? rapists?

Sure, you can make that your stance. Very few will stand with you. There is not a single candidate you can vote for with that standard either.

I’ll read better when you make better arguments, or at least internally consistent ones. Failure to properly read is usually a product of bad writing.

Ahhh, now your true stripes are revealing themselves. Not wanting to coddle the worst of the worst suddenly means that “liberals” are heartless and indifferent. I think you are confused a lot about what the meaning of the words you use. Liberal doesn’t mean everyone is good and deserves help and support. To the…

she said “some” were irredeemable. You seem to think nobody is irredeemable. That is noble even if I’m skeptical of your veracity. I’m ok with some people who are outliers of societal norms being irredeemable. I think Charles Manson is irredeemable. I think white supremacists are irredeemable. I think Isis terrorists…

you consider being racist a “life choice”?

Deplorable doesn’t mean “irredeemable.”