Post one then. Nobody has. You can’t as they don’t exist.

What’s the bigger issue? Her codependency?

No, there is no law against it. And keep up with threads if you want to be coherent.

You must not have been alive when it happened. Clinton saying he didn’t have sex with that woman was him using a definition of the word sex that only you and he agree with, and it caused a major row.

By penetration I meant fingers - touching. Happens every day. And eight year olds can easily get boners - I don’t know if they can have an orgasm.

Neither will I sweetie, as I have clearly qualified it everywhere that I was referring to two children of near age. Others claim that even in that case it’s illegal. It ain’t.

By another eight year old? Happens every day. Called playing doctor.

My wife knows of two that started at 10. They were married for many years until their kids were out of HS.

So Bill Clinton never had sex with Monica? And I did on this very thread. Learn to read.

So cute. I’ve said multiple times “near the same age.

Did you actually read that? Then point out which clause applies to two eight year olds having sex.

I said WE DON’T KNOW, but the feminist assumption seems to be that he was an adult. If he’s not, then Dear Abby was right, SHE has a problem NOW, he may or may not.

They can with another near eight-year old. There is no law against it.

YOU STILL HAVE NOT POINTED OUT WHICH CLAUSE YOU ARE CLAIMING SAYS THAT!

She doesn’t claim she was raped. She claims that her and her BF had sex.

You’re late.

She doesn’t state that. The only valid assumption is that they coerced each other in that case as both were underaged.

Nonconsensual on his part as well.

It does matter the age of the other party, because the laws aren’t written to cover the case of two children. The California law someone else posted doesn’t cover that case.

Nope. Threatening to leave is no coercion in ANY jurisdiction.

Yeah, no. Neither child has the ability to consent under that definition.