Probably in order to have the option to start singing in English and to become international stars.
Probably in order to have the option to start singing in English and to become international stars.
He has reason to be pissed too. When he was born, the line of succession hadn’t been changed to absolute primogeniture yet, so for about a year he was the FIRST in line to the throne, until the evil feminists lawmakers of Sweden changed this.
he is totally an evil prince character.
What bothered me is the “standing in the way of history” remark in the reporter’s tweet. Based on that, is Hillary standing in the way of the first potential Jewish nominee?
That’s what I don’t get. Instead of encouraging Hillary to adopt some policies that would benefit them. (Healthcare, income, taxing the wealthiest.) Every comment on a Bernie story is ‘shut the fuck up old man.’ it’s insane.
Out of curiosity, was Hillary asked if she was racist for trying to get in the way of the first Black president? I don’t remember that happening but I could have missed it. Has Hillary been asked if she is being anti-Semitic for standing in the way of the first Jewish president?
For real, though, that is an incredibly dumb question.
I hate to break it to you, but this mess is really all your daddy’s fault.
I will watch it in the cinema but I really wish they’d just make us some original films with all female casts that aren’t “Mother’s Day”.
I understand that, according to the constitution, Obama needs to step down as president but what’s the law on Michelle staying on as FLOTUS?
(edit) Ugh I misread. I see your point now. The money donated, however, was equivalent to about 5 years of regular donations, so maybe we should check back in 2019. http://time.com/money/4000583/…
I don’t have the stats, but I remember reading that it actually raised a considerable about of money for ALS research. (talking seven figs+)
I’m sorry, but what does this even mean? It would somehow make it significantly better if he didn’t kill a woman? So if he had just 3 dudes on his list “well at least he didn’t target any women”?
I’m not sure the best way to fight the patriarchy is to casually devalue the fact that it adversely affects men as well.
Again... God fucking forbid some man feels some way, that they aren't allowed.
False. Hollywood reboots movies that absolutely do not need them all the time (and most of the time the trailers for those projects look like shit too). I can’t think of a single reboot that has attracted anywhere NEAR the level of vitriol as the Ghostbusters reboot. There’s almost nothing different from Ghostbusters…
Well, shit, if those people tell you they don’t care they are women, well, it must be true. Anyone truly sexist would surely come right out and say so when confronted!
Funny, I read the youtube comments and it’s “OMG SJW feminazi’s ruin everything!”
It’s not just you being cranky (and thanks for linking to that article—some good insights there). I used to devour Salon back during their heyday when they were producing quality journalism on a consistent basis. Now they’re all “hot takes” (god, when will the hot take die in a fire?) and clickbait. And any site that…
I’ve been catching up on different viewpoints of this case and while I agree that his own lawsuits are keeping him in the public eye, if he was exonerated of each and every assault charge, I’m not seeing where the vitriol is coming from. Is it that he’s really super guilty and the exonerations were wrong? Seriously…