Yeah, that’s what I was trying to say... got it backwards.
Yeah, that’s what I was trying to say... got it backwards.
Wow... you really have too much time on your hands.
13% is odd, most say 15% for rwd, manual transmission, more for autos, more for awd cars... but it’s just a rule of thumb anyway.
No... I think we just disagree on what the phrase “much smaller truck” actually denotes.
This is not a discussion of wheelbase....
People just like to bitch, man.
I dunno exactly... look it up.
I forgot to sign my post... my bad.
With a locker, like most rock climbing jeeps and whatnot have, it would have been easy going...
Much smaller truck? You might want to double check that.
And with a rear locker, this would have been child’s play.
So this is all the evidence you need? Lol.
I so want to spur of the moment drive down from Ft Worth for this...
Crack pipe... Add a hardtop and A/C and I’d pay 17 maybe 18 for it.
I’m ok being compared to the Aussies...
No. Not fat at all. They are a hybrid of wild russian boar brought over for hunting sport hundreds of years ago and domesticated live stock. They are very trim, unlike a farm pig, and ridiculously hardy.
I’m sure someone’s brought this up below... don’t have time to scan the comments....
You are drawing conclusions based on entirely different circumstances... the result is, you are wrong.
I don’t know why... but this
It’s funny ‘cause it’s true...