All I can imagine, is that these suits are still going through development and are not fully released, hence the ‘bug’?

I remember working on first party TCR, and that being less painful than third party Lot. No one would just let anything fly through with no testing, but what I’d expect, is that some terminology would be okay to pass, and other low level checks.

That’s a reference to this “I want to say that Sony and MS are equally in control of their pipelines, everyone still has to go through cert, and things are generally the same (in regards to the actual steps). I cannot imagine things would be different. They would all have to put something else at risk/work OT to test…

I’m not entirely sure what you’re referring to.

Baby Toys is next week’s list.

It is in arcades. Or at least, the machines are often occupied.

Dreamcast... Revelator ain’t on that...

Pretty good list!

Yeah, they are. The difference is, is that it doesn’t have the same submission and rejection cycle. Also, if Nintendo submit something that has to run the internal Lot Check, they would likely - in a case as server as this - grant themselves leniency in areas. Same as Microsoft and Sony could do.

Nintendo have less of a problem than most with those patches - outside of general development issues that can come up - they own their process and platform, so although it’s not a non-factor, it is less of a factor.

‘Mad online’ fallout is trivial and fuelled by idiots, Walmart not selling your title, or it being inactive on your very own store front is a larger problem.

It being a retail problem is a different issue. But even then, I doubt that it’d be something where it’s pulled of the shelf. It would have been coordinated that an update is pending, *if* this ever became something that was flagged.

It appears that the Switch’s parental controls can be set via age+ERSB. So, the question for this to be an issue (at least short term), would be if the rating is being queried from a database maintain by ESRB or by Nintendo. If it’s the latter, which is likely, then an ESRB would require Nintendo to update their…

I highly doubt that Nintendo would lock out preexisting customers by upping the age rating of the game on the digital store. I don’t think that was ever going to happen.

Eh... no. She’s rolling up her sleeve, a common idiom for getting to work/working hard. And flexing, which is to appeal/present that women have the brawn to do the typical mens work in this case (due to the era, and they weren’t being sent to the front lines).

Well, it’s released. It didn’t mess with the ESRB rating. It *could* have, but didn’t.

This is the equivalent of giving the bird. Which parents in the US totally would not want their young kids to see - the target audience of Nintendo.

She’s rolling up her sleeve.

Not at the rate that these factories manage.

This is a service often used by dodgy developers/publishers, as you can get caught. And the last thing you’d want is your publishing account to be locked (especially if you have other apps on that account that are making money).