My cinema experience has never been what you describe. Where I live (Australia/NZ), most people are pretty quiet, barring the occasional out-loud laugh, or a rare whoop. Otherwise, it’s a peaceful enjoyment of what’s on-screen. And I like it like that.

Mary Holland is an improv comedian, so gets to do a bunch of different kinds of things - live shows, podcasts, TV, commercials, movies. She was especially great on the series Blunt Talk.

Hey look, it’s Will from His Dark Materials.

Please stop saying ‘bone’.

Me too. Though it looks a bit like Rime.

It depends on what you consider an Easter Egg. People now call any reference, in-joke, or hidden level an Easter Egg, but they shouldn’t. Originally they were hidden in code, not meant to be found, but then having been so and posted in a magazine and shared around, got the name. The definition is they are not meant as…

The good thing about them being space horses is that you can make up the rules.

In the olden days of computer games, that’s where all easter eggs were hidden - in the code itself.

BTW, does the British spelling of “realised” really warrant a [sic]?

For me, Blondie and The Pretenders were the two most British bands in America.

I mean, it’s small potatoes compared to what’s listed here, but I’ve always hated this guy for taking credit for parts of Dragonheart that were actually due to its screenwriter. He’s a talentless hack, and now we see he’s a creepy predatory talentless hack.

wargames involved pushing miniatures around a map, measuring bullet spread with rulers, and crafting historically accurate battlegrounds out of sand

Best guess for stomach model: Amy Adams.

These presidential fan art paintings always creep me out. Both sides make them, there was loads of Obama and Clinton art too, so it’s not restricted. But it always seems to come from extremist fans, which I find a little bit scary.

I think an inflatable boat that had half of it covered as shelter while you paddle or pootle is not a bad idea. I assume that’s already been done before, though.

Sorry, I prefer verifiable logic over conspiracy theory.

At this stage, the ad for The Boys being wrong is not very strong evidence to convince me. I have to believe some guy who says so. Okay, whatever. I am also some guy. But if it is a photoshop job, it seems a very oddly specific way to achieve artificial authenticity. Doesn’t quite convince me on its own.

I find it strange to expect top notch seamless photoshopping of an ad to be mixed in with shoddy photoshopping of a brick wall. Having said that, what ad? I can’t find it in the photo I’m looking at.

The photoshopping behind her back is probably removing the leg of a passerby, perhaps a child, or ugly graffiti. There also seems to be photoshop artefacting beneath the car around the opposite side of the table. Everything else looks real, and such rubbish photoshopping implies nothing nefarious, just some kind of…