No. Talk to lower middle class who basically have no protection and policy intended to help them. The Affordable Care Act is one policy that doesn’t benefit this demographic (often cheaper to take the tax penalty than to pay for subpar coverage).

I’m not talking about making the choice. It’s obvious. I’m discussing the problems that comes with the obvious choice. Just because she’s better than her opposition doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be critical about her policy and say “Oh, no gains for the vulnerable classes is okay I guess.” That isn’t acceptable.

Oh, sorta like Clinton incrementalism that will indefinitely leave the poor and disappearing middle class behind?

This isn’t pedantry. It’s a statement about bad analysis.

No.

I feel like we had a discussion about this on here before and I agree. Definitely more on the better side of things.

And that’s why he still has a role inspiring Americans to look for a different way.

Also, you know MLK had a speech titled “Where Do We Go From Here”? I suggest you and everyone excited about growing inequality in the US check it out.

Five zillion likes!

I don’t visit reddit and I care. Not everyone sees a bright future in half-measures that mostly support the already privileged.

It’s pretty typical of the Jezebel crowd who is selectively a little left on few social issues when it suits a particular identarian agenda but still holds to conservative notions.

The headline and its insinuation is stupid.

No, he looks like someone who is dedicated to social and economic equality unlike most liberals who don’t actually care about that.

If you have a no idea, why don’t you look to country that have successfully legislated and implemented some of his policy goals?

Those vague statements are necessary because a general change of attitude towards social and economic issues is necessary before legislation can be passed.

Why would we want to do that?

yeah, she should totally get solitary and three life sentences.

You don’t like things “ironically.”

She “deserves” our attention. No, she doesn’t. Especially for being a “good singer.” This is the sort of mindset that propagates bad art. What’s more interesting or “deserves” more attention isn’t the quality of her voice (which is unremarkable) but the context of her music and what it says about commercial art and…

The writing is stupid. But so is this: