“she is a good singer, so she deserves your attention.”

A person can be healthy and eat Oreos, duh.

The problem is that you are looking at a website that is largely conservative with the exception of some aspects of some social issues.

You think cheetahs would make quick work of elephants and rhinos?

Actually, it’s more like an argument of semiotics. Farewell, I’ll miss you!

I’ve made the argument “ridiculous” because I asked you to define “attitude” (a word you used) in a discussion about ideology and how it manifests in rituals and cultural practices related to diet? You know, a discussion about imaginary relationships imposed on the natural world to justify behavior?

What does the word “attitude” mean?

You still aren’t talking about the same thing I’m talking about: ideology, structures of power, language and how that manifests in behaviors towards people, animals, and the environment (which encompasses issues like climate change, the factors that drive it, and potential disastrous consequences amongst many other…

Yes, you can make a very sound argument about patriarchy. Here’s the most basic stupid version of the argument you are making: “x can happen because of reasons a, b, c, d, e, f, etc. so x can’t be the result of a (but it can be b, c, d, e, f).” You do understand that the very same arguments that assert justification…

I’m not arguing these issues wouldn’t exist without patriarchy. My reading comprehension is working great, thanks!

No more slaying. So corny.

I think there needs to be some deep journalism on the topic of dick pic senders. Get a couple of them in a room and ask them all the questions everyone wants to know about their unwanted service: “Absolutely no one wants you to do this, so why do you think it’s a good idea? What do you expect to happen after you send…

Is there a market for these kinds of pictures at all? Like, I don’t know anyone who is excited to receive them yet men keep sending them.

Ew.

I totally disagree with all of this. It’s all sorta nonsensical. Factory farming is an environmental issue. Consumption an environmental issue. You can’t separate your diet from environmentalism. Intersectionality plays here as well.

I think the argument is expressed narrowly in the tweet (which isn’t helpful). But I think it can be soundly argued that environmentalism (with animal rights as a feature) is a feminist issue. I’m not sure people are yet comfortable with embrace real discussions about class and the environment that demand changes in…

So an argument that says that the way we treat other humans rests of the foundation of how we treat animals/the environment is ridiculous and not worth a thought? Even in the face of all the social, economic, and political disasters the world may confront with climate change and reduced resources? Sorta totally crazy…

Unless it’s Leonardo DiCaprio. Those comment sections are filled with arguments about age differences being “gross.”

I know it’s not.

Thank goodness. I thought this comment section would degenerate into people saying adults in a relationship with a ten year age difference is wrong.