gterry
Kel Varnsen
gterry

Joss Whedon's comments about Alien Resurrection are classic Whedon. Anytime something he is involved with doesn't go well it is always nothing to do with him and always entirely other people's fault. He even calls out the casting, but if you look at the cast after Weaver it is loaded with great character actors like

Of course you know who else would be interested in being part of a Clueless sequel?

I wonder if the AV Club writers have some kind of weekly Outlook reminder that tells them to write one of these stories. Because the story about a supporting actor who was in one successful thing and wants to do it again seem pretty standard and unsurprising. They should see if they could get some sort of AI bot to

Its especially interesting that no one says anything bad about him when you consider all the serious and award winning actors he has worked with and continue to work with him. People like Kathy Bates, Pacino, Jack Nicholson, Henry Winkler, Brian Cox and Nicole Kidman. It’s not like it is just his buddies like Spade

They were both in Deadwood first and then yes they were both in Kings (which was a great show). Cox was the king before McShane’s character and I think they only had scenes together.

Your both wrong. The obvious choice is Cox and Ian McShane.

So if Jeremy Strong was Daniel Day Lewis’s assistant on a movie does that mean DDL’s character in the movie also had an assistant? Because if not how did that work?

I think I remember reading a comment about that scene somewhere how he was basically a living version of a model of the human muscle/skeletal system you would see at a doctor's office. 

Just find someone younger than Brett Goldstein who can believably play the character and do a young Roy Kent show. It would all depend on the age of the actor they get since it would be hard to cast. Basically anything from teen aged Roy up would be hilarious, although a Roy in his 20's probably at the peak of his

Yea it seems like the good ones would be in a best position to transition into not using real guns. Because they already know how guns should look and behave on screen and have connections with directors. I recently watched Light and Magic on Disney+ which was about the history of ILM. When CGI started being used

I looked at that link and it seems to mostly restrict things like language, obscene sex and nudity. It’s not like Breaking Bad was winning Emmys for having those things. It was winning them for strong writing and acting. Even Mad Men almost never used swearing or had scenes of sex/nudity that were worse than what you

I would way rather see that be an award given out on TV than any of the short film categories.

Is there anything actually stopping a studio from making a big budget blockbuster type movie that is a serious Oscar contender? Other than it would be a massive risk.

Because everyone knows it's easy to keep working when you are very sick or seriously injured.

So now that he is an adult I wonder if when he spills something on the floor if he just covers it with newspaper?

Kind of like Hugh Grant, also on the list. Tons of great roles, but first thing I remember is the blow job arrest.

I wonder if for Buscemi it is an association thing. I mean he has been in 5 Cohen bros movie, but he has also been in like 15 Adam Sandler movies. I can see that hurting his chances with some voters, but at the same time after being in that many Sandler movies he probably doesn’t care.

Going from 1 woman of colour winner to 2 is only a 100% increase. Also I don't believe Maori people are considered Asian.

I tried one episode of The Alarmist and it was not very good (the why did the Beatles break up one). It was a lot of speculation and looking stuff up on Wikipedia during the episode, rather than actual research and information.

Didn't know she was in BtVS but I was watching King of the Hill recently and was surprised that her name popped up in the voice cast for several random Season 8 episodes.