grrsumner21
Peter
grrsumner21

The idea of a “neg” is to be playful teasing that throws a woman off her game/lowers her confidence and thus makes her intrigued by the “PUA.” It also assumes some sort of baseline comfort (i.e. you don’t open with the neg, you use it once you’ve established yourself somewhat). The classic example is “your hair is

Yup. Unfortunately, many young men/boys (even those that already have confidence and success with women) see male/female interaction as some kind of game (cheat codes, keeping score, etc.).

Howabout “patients”??

They can be phenomenal for those who attend.

That is not what the best evidence rule means/requires.

Doesn’t understand hearsay, the best evidence rule, criminal procedure, or grammar.

Well, if it makes you feel better, you can console yourself with the knowledge that neither HOFer won a Super Bowl.

I pretty regularly read through all the Gawker media blogs. That is definitely true about Jezebel, but I think the only blog where I can’t recall reading a troll post is io9. But I guess because spoilers for the Avengers don’t incite virulent racism ...

Yea, I lump the longtime commenters who are unapologetic bigots in with trolls, but they certainly are two different things.

Is there a way to ban these morons? I mean, I know they’ll just create new burners and whatnot, but I see some trolls with somewhat substantial comment histories, consisting entirely of malicious racist shit and wonder how they are allowed to keep commenting.

You sound like an awesome dog owner. However, I wouldn’t interpret comments from people with children as worrisome, in that they don’t take care of their kids to the degree that you take care of your dog. I would interpret it more as slightly judgmental in that, as parents, but not dog owners, they couldn’t imagine

That’s what I’m afraid of.

That illustration will haunt my dreams.

Well done!

It wasn’t his call.

I think it’s a weird self-selection going on based on the fact that only a small portion of Eagles and Jets fans actually know how to read and write.

Agreed! Probably because this is a less well traveled blog.

Yea, I agree with what you’re saying. I didn’t want to overcomplicate it in my post, but yea, I’m down with changing the main work from cycle to cycle while keeping the same rep scheme. Feel like this works best with conjugate programs like Westside or the Cube.

The weaknesses you’re talking about are things that can be addressed with assistance work. By all means, feel free to change up your assistance work, but that doesn’t mean you need to completely change your program. Most programs have some inherent degree of flexibility built in so you can modify assistance work to

You’re misusing the term “periodization.” Every program has some form of periodization built it. Does the program call for increased weight over time? Increased percentage of your max? Increased volume (i.e. more sets/reps, etc.)? Then periodization is involved. The best advice I’ve ever heard is “run the program over