grounderisbot
GrounderisBot
grounderisbot

To be clear: I’m not criticizing Stallone as an actor, although I think your classification of that speech and his delivery is incredibly hyperbolic. I’m talking about his presence on screen. There’s a handful of actors who are or were once superstars who don’t really work in small roles because the moment they come

No, it’s specifically Batman V Superman, because... I dunno, having the S was a bit much? They wanted to annoy us? Wonder Woman is the V?

I have to disagree here. I’m not delving into the merits or flaws of the film or the director, but I must say that I doubt Superman would automatically become a beacon of hope. To some? Most likely. But you have to factor in the crapstorm of people freaking out about the proof of alien life, the religious and

Going to have give a big “What?” on this one. There’s a difference between killing and murder. If you kill in self-defense or while protecting someone else, it is given different standing (generally both legally and ethically) against just a straight-up slaughter. MoS had problems, but the above statement is some real

Well, the thing is it certainly might suck (I have my doubts too!) and I don’t think it will flop but it could underperform.

Yes. Because that’s what most internet commenters do — whine like they think anyone who makes these things gives a shit.

So if Superman kills Doomsday like he does, will a bunch of people whine about that too? If they do Darkseid, and he annihilates parademons, like normal, will people bitch then too?

I think the obvious comparison is Jurassic World, which got mediocre reviews and tons of scorn from fanboys, yet no one is running from that franchise.