gregoryjourdan
Ominous@RG
gregoryjourdan

Love the excuse: "this was exactly what we intended to happen". Ok, let's mark this one airport down to never ever fly to, then.

With light coming straight to your eyes? I think it's not her eyes you see opening from time to time, but the projection. Isn't it?

What about the safety of flying those things above a crowd to begin with? I'm surprised this was allowed in the first place, and I kinda think dronies need to be taught a couple lessons about how obnoxious they are at times.

Heck yeah, future!

And it's not over. Paragon levels in Diablo III are infinite. Since there's no cap, he can just grind further—although going from 1000 to 1001 will take as much experience points as the first 244 levels combined.

I mean to be honest I'm not too much into the personal/family drama, but the thing is, To The Moon and Gone Home really aren't written by novel authors. If they are then I'm sorry they are not doing so great. The issue with trying to sell game as a story art form is why would we settle less interesting and well

Yeah, didn't get all that much into it either. I don't want to be dismissive (but I guess I am being...) but to me the story sold because it's sad. Is it well written? I don't know, it all seemed a little convoluted and not exactly connected to me. Is it personal and original? Yeah. So maybe that's enough to find it

Ok so that's kinda weird to see a bunch of old men selling that game's remake.

I feel like Flappy Bird Family is more of a game than the original anyways.

This one has the NO arrow in the wrong direction, and even if it was fixed I don't understand how you have to go back to the first set of questions from there...

"Focus on logic": not everyone who is smart (or knowledgeable, which can be quite different) is applied, patient, analytic and logic.

I know we all hate when people throw dogma at us, but how about animal instinct? It seems pretty natural to me that people would like to have offspring. I very rarely resort to this type of argument but to me the fact that live beings are more and more into the idea of just not bringing life does sound selfish and

Why not 50%, that would make for even simpler calculations :p
Seriously though, if you double the tax in most cases you'll be in between 15 and 20 percents; if you divide by ten you'll be at 10 percents; and if you add half to that you'll be at 15, so I don't see how it's so hard...

Now, there's a lot about this paragraph that is kind of gross. As our sister site Jezebel says, Temkin is basically "employing the tropes of rape culture in his own defense, even while wrapping himself in the language of social justice and positioning himself as a good feminist." Nevermind the non-apology (if it was

Yep, all good^^

"If you have to add a mod to make a game better, then it wasn't PERFECT". There, fixed.

Of course, it would be insane to imply that one's commitment dictates their desires. No one will ever tell you what you are into, but that's like step zero of the conversation :) I just meant that if you're monogamous you will by definition have to chose...

As far as your preferences are concern I totally agree. But if we are talking about a couple though...

I know it's became very cool to hate on how people use technology, but how much more dangerous is it to bust out your phone when you are already in the middle of a stampede?

Is it so good though? I appreciate it's trying to have a story, but it kinda takes forever to unravel as far as I am in the game, and the gameplay is pretty much nonexistent... I'm having a hard time to enjoy the narration enough to bother... :/