Yeah, he has a nice point, but actually these people would be laughingstocks even in the 1500s.

I just looked it up on YouTube. In the show Cersei asks the witch "Will the king and I have children?" and the witch replies, "No, the king will have twenty children, and you will have three… Gold will be their crowns, gold their shrouds." So, take that for what it's worth.

I mean, Jorah probably has other functions within the plot (he might end up being the wight they bring back from the wall, just saying), but yeah, it's pretty much the show's most basic MO to turn a triumph like curing Jorah's greyscale into a tragedy, like having him stupidly kill the woman he loves out of sheer…

Well, they made up a long time ago, before he left her service and went to the Citadel, so that's a complaint for another season.

I agree he thinks he's cured. But how does he actually know that for certain? How do any of us know that? The cure he received was largely untested, so I'm still waiting on real confirmation that (A) the infection won't return and (B) he isn't still a carrier.

But the risk that he might contract it was stated outright. Sam explicitly went ahead with the procedure in spite of that risk. At no point did Sam indicate that he was certain he wouldn't contract it. You might think it's out of character, but that's what happened.

Seriously, though, am I the only one who thinks Daenerys definitely contracted greyscale during her very touchy reunion with Jorah? Anyone?

So, am I the only one who's fairly certain we just watched Daenerys contract greyscale? Anyone?

How dare he subpoena witnesses to support his case.

It may not have been in the original script, but it was still said in the show and is canon. Roddenberry could have cut the line entirely if he was that adamant.

Bookshelves in actual medieval libraries often featured chains. The real-world chains, however, were attached to the books to prevent theft, unlike the ones in the show.

This is actually incorrect. For most of the show's run, if you look at the credits, the character is credited as either "Dr. Who" or "Doctor Who," and that is what the original producers called the character. Even Christopher Eccleston and David Tennant were credited as "Doctor Who" in some episodes.

Wait… What happened to The Devil in the White City?

Hang on, I saw this on Buffy. There's a clan of gypsies for whom this is a specialty.

Just the fact that they were selling tobacco. That's what made half of them "offensive."

A lot of Trump supporters are not particularly religious, and he was elected on a primarily non-religious platform. Hell, religion came up less in his campaign than it did in Obama's.

Coming to an understanding doesn't mean you compromise or even change your own beliefs. It just means you understand each other better. That is worthwhile in and of itself.

How is that in the least bit relevant?

You do realize it is mostly the Trump supporters doing the reaching out in this instance, right? I'm not a Trump supporter myself, but give credit where it's due.

Wow. Dude, screw you and your chauvinistic fixation on this woman's appearance. Gal Gadot was excellent in the role in every respect.