I think they’re working off of some emails which indicate that people inside the DNC had started reaching out to coordinate with the Clinton campaign re: the general election after it was clear Bernie had almost no chance of winning but before he conceded. That and the Brazile email.

Because Hillary Clinton personally kicked in Bernie Sanders’s teeth in the primary, winning by 4 million votes.

I f—ing despise Mayweather, but let’s be real. He would beat her face in just as easily as he did to his baby momma ;)

mayweather is unbeteable and he destroyed boxing but this crap ufc is not better :- (

She was never that good of an MMA fighter. She had 1 big skill and no real coaching. As the level of athletes increased and people’s skill levels went up, she just stayed the same.

You can easily make the same argument about voters on both sides. Who slashed the social safety net to pieces lately? Bill Clinton. Who repealed Glass-Steagal? Again, Bill Clinton. I’m not here to slam Bill Clinton. (It’s already been done enough, I’m sure.) But I am trying to say that this demonizing of the…

These hot takes are so shallow and uninformed. What change(s) led to the trends in the graph? You can’t just say “REAGAN DID THAT!” and then also say “Well, Obama can’t be expected to single-handedly fix everything at once!” Either a president can make an impact or he can’t.

Sure when Obama came into office and had a filibuster proof Senate and House majority that really prevented him from doing anything. But, please keep calling people names, that really adds to your argument.

No comment that in about 2008 the graph goes, basically, straight up? It looks like the inequality went down under the Bush administration and then right back up and, likely, to its highest level under Obama. No article about that, huh?

Huh? I was just pointing out a small editing error that can be corrected. Jeebus dude, get a grip.

My god will the hunt for people to blame never cease? What is with you? How many enemies do you need? Why, at the end of the election, are liberals so set on finding out-group enemies rather than looking in at ANYTHING they do or say?

Most rational comment of the day! Unfortunately, too many people on the far left would rather be blindingly furious all the time.

How dare you attempt to formulate an actual strategy that goes beyond the current mania for taunts, jeers and contempt.

She failed in getting 270 electoral votes, which is how the presidency is won. The path to 270 is the goal, not the popular vote.

That entire margin is in one state. Look, I wanted Hillary to win, but she didn’t. We can’t keep grasping at the popular vote win because it doesn’t mean anything.

Sure. Whatever you say, friend. I wish you all the luck in the world assembling a winning electoral coalition with that attitude.

Honestly, I’m not sure that it is gaining power. I realize this may be a hot take interpretation of the data, but it’s entirely possible that this baloney just looks like it’s gaining power because the small band of crazies is really scared, and really energized, about how their world is disappearing.

I’m super curious. How would you describe the systematic murder of the white population of Haiti? A surprise party?

Get right on out of here with your ‘reasonable opinion’! People should be allowed to say whatever they want without being yelled at, as long as the things people are saying aren’t things I disagree with personally!