Careful with the polyunsaturated fats: https://proteinpower.com/drmike/2016/02…

I’ve been doing that for three years and I have never been healthier.

I’ve been low carb or carb free for 3+ years. Lost 80lb. Have kept it off. (6'4", 210lb at the moment.) At age 45 I have more aerobic endurance than I had in my 20's, and I’ve resumed practicing Aikido. (Had to stop at 30yo due to weight issues.)

Man, flashback time.

This isn’t a FAQ, it’s just another excuse to shit on the movie. We get it. You don’t like it.

While more creations from Carruth would be great, I wouldn’t want a remake of Primer. It’s an absolute gem.

Wait, so since the character is a martial artist they should be Asian?

“...once into a thorium fuel cycle with reprocessing...”

“However, it is more radioactive out of the ground, greatly increasing the difficulty and cost of fuel production.”

> There are not many people fond of the ending to Man of Steel

I haven’t accused you of being emotional. Read carefully.

I’m sensing you’re about to type “Fukushima” and “Chernobyl” and “nuclear waste.” Fear of radiation won’t stop us from building more plants because the need is just too great. And the fantastic thing about the worldwide nuclear industry is that it learns from it’s mistakes very well. Again, it’s time to emotionally…

Right, you have no specific problem with it, you just hang around random message boards persistently arguing against using it.

You have to design a plant before you build one, right?

> are you paying for these “new designs”

Jaczko is a protoge of Harry Reid, and despite the fact that he was chairman of the NRC is actually quite anti nuclear in his outlook. (Republicans aren’t the only ones that can do burrow in people to destroy government agencies.) His views are overly pessimistic about nuclear, especially when it comes to the timeline…

Not so far-fetched. Violent anti intellectualism is growing: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-c…

Maybe Wolfram is on to something: http://www.kurzweilai.net/reflections-on… Possibly the building blocks are rules.

Except that it isn’t. CO2 still ends up in the atmosphere, just like it does with a forest fire. Biomass is just a forest fire where we capture some of the heat and use it to boil water and turn a turbine. The CO2 release is the same. So if forest fires are bad so is biomass.

Riddle me this: if forest fires are s bad, why is burning wood as “renewable biomass” so good?