This would have been a way better premise to the article.
This would have been a way better premise to the article.
My equation? I'm just telling you that your portrayal of the controversy is wrong, so own it or fuck off.
The company donating to anti-lgbtq organizations =\= “statements by an employee or two.”
I’m assuming that would still require packaging it in some way. Dunno if they’re selling it the brewery, or if there brewery it’s just hauling at away for free, but it saves Kellogg’s money and still reduces food waste. I figure positive side effects of capitalism is the best we can hope for from most corporations.
I understood this question to be regardless of a person’s stance on immigration itself. People can love the salmon tacos and hate the Reptilicons. Frankly, I’d be up for giving the governing policies of Planet X a try.
I like, "it's the end of third shift for somebody."
I have so many questions. Are we talking unlimited free hot dogs? If not, is the workload per free hot dog reasonable? How expensive are the hot dogs? Does the work cut into the real job she presumably has? Where’s the Splinter article decrying this as a crime against Labor? What percent of her diet is free hot dogs?
Quality, non-chain food is more expensive and generally better-tasting than fast food, news at 11.
I’m just hoping the past tense is “crabe-mat.”
*eyes roll back into head*
I wear shorts over them at the gym, but if it’s winter and I’m running in compression tights+long spandex, I don’t bother (I can’t imagine anyone gets a good enough view to see the outline of anything).
Schroedinger's Kevin.
That’s gonna be a “yikes” from me.
Nooooooope.
Huh, that's weird. When I'm pissing every 15 minutes and slowly starving to death, the last thing I am is productive. Am I doing it wrong?
You know you can just reply to the greys if they aren't obvious trolls...
I really can’t hate the guy QUITE as much as I should, simply because he does dumb-funny shit like this.
In retrospect I'm sure that would have been the better option, but I really don't think a BRIEF conversation across one person is something that needed to be dissected at length. At worst it's impolite. But this is a basketball game, not the opera.
I’m not even sure how this is close talking? Somebody's never seen the Seinfeld episode where this was coined.
Jezebel’s Gawker-esque blogging on this has been really ugly. The blogger and whichever editor approved these hit pieces over a non-story should be ashamed.