Literally the smartest response to Bryan’s piece.

It just occurred to me Bryan really doesn’t even need feminism - she could have achieved being an unmarried virgin centuries ago.

P.S. Thank you for your 18 years of hard work on behalf of the kiddos.

“We need to be praying for Hillary Clinton. There’s special needs there, there’s mental impairment...”

Choosing chastity because you dig that lifestyle is feminism. Choosing chastity because sex = sin and realizing that you like being chaste is Stockholm Syndrome.

Yeah I mean I feel like this lady thought she’d get more intrigue by a click baity title. There’s nothing inherently feminist about abstinence, in fact I’d say if your motivation is based on a commandment from a patriarchal religion then there’s an argument to be made that it is not feminist at all. I really don’t…

Seems to me that dutifully following a religion such as Catholicism, which places strict limits on what women can/cannot do, isn’t feminism at all.

I love the 0.0

They appropriated cultural practices of indigenous peoples and made it sound sciency and like it takes super special snowflake people to do it.

Agreed. There is so much judgement and guilt with AP. I read the original book, and there were some concepts that were useful but there was no way you could work and do AP by the book. Basically you have to become utterly devoted to your child’s needs, and ignore your own utterly.

Awww. Seriously, though vaccines are amazing and no one should have to suffer the effects of these diseases

Dr. Sears is a fucking dickhole. And attachment parenting is a gross term middle/upper class white ladies use to feel smug and superior to other mothers who either can’t or don’t want to practice it. So fuck him for that.

Wow. Props to that guy.

Because the appearance of impropriety in a woman is more of a threat than actual evidence of impropriety in a man. This is known.

Yeah. WHY IS HE GETTING A PASS?!

I just threw my work computer out the window.

From now on, all briefings should be conducted using body language exclusively. The intelligence officers will sit silently while Trump stares at them, and determines from the angle of their knees what ISIS will do next.

So they sent three immature men with anger issues to an intelligence briefing? What could possibly go wrong?

OK, so HRC had improperly marked emails on a server that was not the official State Department server, and people are all up in arms that maybe some classified information maybe COULD HAVE BEEN compromised (let’s pay no attention to the fact that the actual government servers on which her emails would normally be WERE…