You’d have to put some form of Linux on an SD and then figure out how to boot it up on the drive. Plex needs an operating system to piggyback on, it doesn’t have it’s own stand alone operating system.
You’d have to put some form of Linux on an SD and then figure out how to boot it up on the drive. Plex needs an…
As in hosting a plex server or just as additional storage for a plex server
As in hosting a plex server or just as additional storage for a plex server
School district. Lots of folks using the connection. Not sure if that matters or not
I’m at work and just busted up laughing at this. Weird looks all around
Have to love the work internet
No it doesn’t. If it’s on your network, you can access it. Even with out internet. It doesn’t route out of your house to some server somewhere and then back, because the server is on your home network.
No. They would have to get a warrant and make you give them the code, I believe
May be about 9 years too late
I think he means, he doesn’t understand why people would want one
I think he means, he doesn’t understand why people would want one
I was reading an article that had interviewed DG managers. They said that the detergent is the most common thing stolen from all of their stores. Specifically the pods, because people would just open the bag and dump individual pods into purses and what not
How do you make it all the way back to the vehicle and then let a starving, beat down wolf separate you from it? Why would you keep moving farther away? If the wolf started to come close, kick at it and I’d imagine it would back up. Just get into the vehicle and be done with it
Pick on the grammar all you want, doesn’t change the fact that you’re bitching because someone is bank rolling suits against a company they don’t like, legally. It doesn’t matter if you hate Thiel, think he’s “chicken shit” or that he’s doing it “because it makes his asshole pucker.” The law is the law. He can legally…
Frivolous litigation? He is backing a completely legal and non-frivolous suit. He isn’t making anything up to just randomly sue someone. Gawker messed up, got sued and he decided to bank roll it. Gawker wouldn’t have to worry about this if they hadn’t messed up in the first place with Hogan.
The fact is, if he is doing it legally, then he has every right to. Gawker made the mistake, he is just capitalizing on it
Using the law to your advantage.. Pretty sure that’s legal last I checked. Just because someone doesn’t like the outcome doesn’t make it any less so
They started this whole mess by talking shit about the guy. “Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it” and all that
Exactly. This doesn’t set any kind of precedent for any one to sue any news outlet just because they don’t like what was being said. The news outlet first has to do something illegal before someone can sue them with any chance of winning. Now, if you want to jump in on that and help pay for it.. Well, its petty as…
You act like after this, people will just be able to randomly sue a news organization because they don’t like what they say. The fact is, Gawker fucked up by posting something they shouldn’t of and he took advantage of that fact to get some pay back. Is it petty? Yes. Is it shutting down free speech? No. If Gawker…
The road was the full total amount of data that can travel through a line at a time (it can hold 4 “cars” worth of data). The cars were the amount of data you are paying for from the ISP. You’re paying for a “cars” worth of data on a network that can hold 4 “cars”worth of data at one time (I was just using the lanes…
not even remotely close
