You didn’t like it, and that’s fine. But to say you “had no idea what Pitt’s character actually wants” is not a good argument. To say it’s a “collection of scenes” is not a good argument. To say a filmmaker could’ve spent an hour doing anything and then just tacked in an ending sequence is not a good argument. If it I…

Glass half full view: Given that Altamont happened less than 4 months after Woodstock in 1969, maybe this cancellation means whatever horrible thing was destined to happen on December 6, 2019 will also not happen.

This is a great critique of a brave but wildly misunderstood film. It’s best not to have any spoilers revealed ahead of time because the dread you feel as an observer - maybe even mixed with a bit of guilt - needs a release and that works best if you don’t know the ending. But I’ve seen it twice and it honestly works…

Are we overlooking the most obvious reason this trade got made? Isn’t is most likely that the Mets thought they were trading for Abe Froman, the sausage king of Chicago?

So, basically you’re saying the Mets are calling Tebow up to the Majors tomorrow?

Ellen Barkin walked away with the coveted Blockbuster Entertainment Award for Favorite Supporting Actress - Adventure / Drama for her starring role in ‘Switch’.

Feck yeah.

Most people already know those words. But your comment does raise an interesting question: Did you have to look up the word “thesaurus”? I’m only asking because you seem kind of intimidated by people who have an average adult vocabulary.

Maybe Koepka should practice with a slow-playing partner.

What kind of lawyer says death threats are no big deal? A good lawyer would’ve said, “Death threats, yada yada yada. By the way, my sex life is perfect.”

Barstool offered him a job as Chief Barstool Officer. 

Meanwhile, over at Kotaku, one of the top comment threads is the one where the OC speculates that the arsonist probably set the fire because his “ex-girlfriend” was probably flirting with his manager and he couldn’t take it anymore. So he murdered 33 people. Who would’ve thought that someone would jump at the chance…

I know it’s only July 18th, but we already have a winner in the “Moron of the Month” contest. Not surprisingly, it’s a doofus who blames the murderer’s phantom, invented “ex-girlfriend” for the fire, speculating with no evidence whatsoever that a woman must’ve flirted with someone in management, giving the arsonist an…

But if @tadbravo had waited until there was actual information, it would’ve been more difficult to blindly speculate that an ex-girlfriend was to blame for flirting with the boss. I mean, come on, we must find a way to blame women for this, don’t you understand?

Just shut up. Also, dumbbell, it’s “per se,” not “per say.”

Then maybe don’t be a dumb dipshit speculating on something you don’t know anything about. Sorry, I meant ignorant, worthless dipshit.

Again, if your point was valid do you think not one of these players or coaches has a lawyer who would tell them that? If that’s the case, you should hang up a shingle in Bolton: “Phartus, Esq.: Internet Commenter and Solicitor”. And find yourself a good Barrister while you’re at it. 

I know that’s your point. But if someone came to you and said they were party to a contract but they had unilaterally decided it was null and void so they wanted to sign a competing contract with you, would you just say, “Sure thing!”

Let’s look at this in a glass-half-full sort of way: If they played only away games, at least they’d have hot water on game days.

Reluctance on the part of teams that don’t want to be sued for signing players still under contract with another club? Just a guess.