graefix
graefix
graefix

Came here to say this. That’s... quite a trajectory. A distillation, really. Take anything that was coherent and sensical about Goldwater, boil it away, and you’re reduced to Reagan. Take that and spin it down, and you’ve got a hard lump of stupid named George W. Bush. Take that and burn it in a crucible, and you’ve

I keep seeing different self important declarations like these about how someone assuming the person supports Trump was the last straw to push that person over to support him. What they are really saying is they know it’s socially reprehensible to go along with some of the more extreme ideals and are looking for an

Outstanding.

It seems hypocritical to keep referring to it as an egg and not a chicken.

Half the country doesn’t vote every single presidential election, though. 130 million people voted in 2008, a little less in 2012. Note, I’m NOT excusing the mistakes the Clinton camp made, but let’s not act like we had 200 million + voting until Hillary Killed Their Happiness or whatever.

I’m sure the lack of enthusiasm that the DNC, its support system, and its donors felt for Bernie Sanders had nothing to do with the fact he was an Independent for 40 years—one who switched to the Democratic party solely to make his run easier.

It’s the alt-right sports version of the girl who sued UT Law School for affirmative action all the way to the Supreme Court even though she was way too dumb to gain entrance in any alternate universe.

I’m sure there could have been a better candidate, but I’m not sure the Democratic party put one forward.

1) Brazile did what Brazile decided to do. That is evidence of one person taking an action (and a dumb one). That is not evidence of a huge, top-down conspiracy.

No National Committee is going to nominate a candidate who gets his ass handed to him by 4 million votes. Accept that. Let that fact take root in your fragile psyche.

If you believe all that garbage about HRC you’re as big a rube as those who voted for him. You bought the right wing propaganda hook, line, and sinker. The fact that the DNC pushed for an actual Democrat as opposed to an independent should shock no one, unless they’re stupid. It became clear early on that the Bernie

Because she got more votes in the primaries? I voted for Bernie Sanders in the MO primary by the way. Did the Democratic establishment prefer a longtime member with tons of experience and fairly Obama-style moderate views over the extremely liberal independent from Vermont (yes I know he caucuses with the party)? Yes.

The DNC didn’t anoint her as anything. The Democratic Party voted for her.
She was the chosen candidate of the DNC in 2008 too and she still lost. If Bernie had run a better campaign and Clinton hadn’t spent 30 years creating a network of political pros at her disposal, he would have won.

Clinton 65,844,954

“Someone remind me why Sanders’ inner circle wrote off the South again?”

SO MANY LAYERS in this. but let’s talk about how he starts the interview by first confirming that she’s a conservative, and that then naturally allows him to open up about how she obviously makes comments about “beautiful young men” who turn out to be 12-15 years old. And when she says “No, I’ve never done that you

At least he dressed up for the occasion.

Schilling looks like the truck driver at the counter in some diner in the middle of nowhere ready to tell you how the world REALLY works, which they aren’t gonna teach you in some fancy college.

The same people who were upset about men dressing as women to sneak into public bathrooms are going to defend this.

I absolutely love how the Trump campaign is saying that the anonymous sources providing the Apprentice sound bites are “publicity hungry” and “opportunistic.”