*Should HAVE been you, terriblehuman

Diversity is a good thing. Looking at every character and seeing if they should be female seems complete crazy to me. It’s rare that the gender matters at all in games (I mean storywise, not representation),so how do you have that conversation?

>you can’t propose the idea of letting the wealthy pay for everything, while the poor can remain poor

the wealthy would be paying for everything, eh? Didn’t realize that Bernie was calling for eliminating income tax and sales tax.

When you say things like “free shit” re: Bernie you’re basically saying “i have absolutely no idea what i’m talking about”

How does he get ripped off? He has their car as collateral, even wrecked I’d think it would be worth more than the tow.

They are very balanced and totally rational to any democracy outside the US that actually has good social safety nets

I do make $100k/year and I support him. I dont want anything for free (except free Uber rides like that guy in Funbag lucked into) but I would appreciate it if roads and bridges were maintained/improved.

Yeah, I’m sure he has had many interactions with “socialist-minded” people and that they have “berned” him! That’s a totally plausible scenario, just like God talking to him.

but god? He prob would have done that. Old testament god is a total dick

So unfair! All your working out and steamed vegetables and still no one likes you! And everyone liked her.

Yeah but these laws make sense because, just like gun control laws, they only affect law abiding citizens WAIT SHIT

If he asked to borrow toilet paper, I’d tell him to just use a sock.

Has there ever been a single case of a transgender person attempting to molest a child in a restroom? I’d be more worried about my kids spending time alone with a Republican wrestling coach.

Nice of him to at least use a self-portrait.

People aren’t taking issue with you because you said/implied that the behavior was okay.

“I realize that my views and opinions will be in the minority here...I’m absolutely okay with that.”

I think the validity of the comparison is pretty clear. In both instances, the result is the same (death, or people being watched during sex). The intent matters enough to warrant different terminology and different sentences. In both cases, accidentally causing the result should be treated far differently than…

I feel like maybe there’s something not in your comment, because from where I’m sitting, there’s a really big difference between spending fifteen years spying on guests having sex in one’s own hotel than accidentally catching nature lovers getting down in the bushes. Intent, for one. Scope, for two. Delusions of…

It’s the difference between rubbernecking at a car wreck in passing, versus going out of your way to rush to the scene of every wreck you can. And sometimes, maybe, doing something that might cause an accident for you to look at.