There is no prohibition in the federal government about checking government email on a non-government computer. It’s a matter of convenience so that people can check their email when they are out of the office. I don’t know what kind of organization you work for, but every private sector job I’ve had allows the same…

No. The sample size is quite large, actually. There are 4 million people with clearances, and those people fuck up quite often mixing classified info on unclassified systems (called spillage) because of being human and all. That’s how he can say that no one would be prosecuted for this because it’s the kind of shit…

She could have nipped this all in the bud if she wanted to, and released those emails, but didn’t.

Not the best look, but it ain’t Watergate either. She didn’t give Clinton questions in a head-to-head matchup with Bernie Sanders— that really would have been unfair and disadvantaged Sanders. This was not that. If CNN can pay Trump employee Lewandowski as an “analyst,” if CNN can run full Trump speeches, including…

So, just a few years ago when I was about 38 or so, I went on a business trip to Boston. I knew no one there and had no plans, so on a Friday night a couple days before I was scheduled to leave, I made my way down to the hotel bar. I LOOKED FABULOUS for some reason— my hair was ON POINT and my baby tee set my boobs…

Interesting how they never show this guy’s comments in context. We have no idea what he’s talking about or what the conversation is about. He doesn’t say, “We find a list of registered dead people and bus people in from another state to vote as those dead people.” He just says, “We bus people in to deal with you…

This is stupid. The court has already said the pipeline can move forward. What is Clinton supposed to do? Take a stand against the court? Ask protesters to violate the law because they don’t like the ruling?

How fair is that though? They aren’t in a position to judge whether the process followed the law and met applicable standards; the Army Corps of Engineers is doing that now and a court has already said that the pipeline can move forward. Why would the Clinton campaign issue any opinion that challenges the rule of law…

this isn’t an insanity defense: it’s an evaluation of his ability to understand the charges and not hinder his defense when the case goes to trial.

I don’t doubt his mental illness or inability to competently stand trial, but this defense is seldom allowed for black or Muslim defendants who engage in terroristic behavior. The Long Island Railroad shooter and the Fort Hood shooter, for example, were obviously mentally impaired, but they weren’t allowed an insanity…

What a nice brother Ken Davidoff has. What the fuck?

It’s all they have at this point.

No doubt.

And everyone who’s ever known him says pretty much the same thing. It’s telling that no one in Congress, including his own party likes him.

Couldn’t have happened to a nicer guy.

Bill Clinton at least has some support for the idea that he’s the smartest guy in every room, and more often than not, he’s correct. Bill has ego; Trump is a sociopath.

He doesn’t have to give the money back, but it can’t go in his pockets either. How can it benefit it after the election? He won’t be having any more campaign events to fill the coffers of his properties.

Damn.

I can’t really blame Ivanka. She’s his daughter. Yes she’s an adult, but we don’t have “rational” relationships or reactions when it comes to our loved ones. Additionally, she’s probably the one person in his life he 1) loves most, and 2) has loved most consistently, (though creepily), and 3) is his closest, most…

Didn’t we always kind of know it would come to this? Why didn’t Trump? Why would a public figure who makes his bread and butter on the good will of at least a portion of the public, risk ALL of that to seek high office? Political campaigns almost NEVER make us feel better about candidates— they strip candidates bare…